
Part 2 of The Mystery of Nature's Fine Tuning. Read Part 1 here.
"This is counterintuitive: the more miraculous our existence seems, the more inevitable it becomes under strict conditions; relax those conditions, and our existence starts to look like a fluke!" -- Author
As I wrote that final sentence in the previous article, a ruminative thought struck me. I was only half right about the Drake Equation. Revising it with Bayesian inference was the right instinct, but I had completely missed its connection to anthropic reasoning and the trap that connection creates.
For readers new to this series, found here, here's the essential idea: the so-called "fine-tuning problem" becomes less mysterious once we apply conditional probability (Bayesian inference). We don't observe the universe at a random moment, so we can't use a frequentist argument that assumes random sampling. Our existence already filters what we can observe.