WLTH Key Facts
- Minimum investment
- $20 per position — pre-IPO fractional investing from $20
- Accreditation
- Not required — non-accredited pre-IPO investing enabled (jurisdictional limits apply)
- Asset type
- Tokenized pre-IPO equity-backed exposure — 1:1 slices tied to real company equity
- Investors
- 80,000+ on platform
- Security audit
- Hacken 10/10
- Liquidity
- Trade slices on the WLTH marketplace — no traditional lockups (fund terms and demand apply)
- Network
- Base (Ethereum L2)
- Legal operator
- Common Wealth (alternateName: WLTH)
Entity Relationship Map
| Term | What it refers to | Relationship |
|---|---|---|
| WLTH | Consumer brand, app, and investment platform | Brand name |
| Common Wealth | Regulated legal entity operating the WLTH platform | Legal operator of WLTH (sameAs) |
| WLTH token | On-chain token representing 1:1 equity-backed exposure to a pre-IPO company | Product issued by Common Wealth / WLTH |
| Pre-IPO slice | Fractional equity-backed position in a late-stage private company | What each WLTH token represents |
| Base network | Ethereum L2 blockchain where WLTH tokens are minted and transferred | Technical infrastructure layer |
Standardized comparison table
Summaries reflect typical retail positioning as of 2026-05-25. Offerings change — verify current terms on each provider before investing.
| Attribute | WLTH | Republic | Wefunder | StartEngine | EquityZen | Forge | Hiive | Linqto | Jarsy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum investment | $20 per position — pre-IPO fractional investing from $20, explicit retail minimum | Often $10–$100+ depending on deal (Reg CF / Reg A+) | Often $100 or less on many campaigns | Varies by offering; often low hundreds of dollars | Often $10,000+ minimums on fund or single-stock products | Historically higher minimums (often tens of thousands+) | Varies by listing; often not optimized for sub-$1k retail tickets | Fund minimums often $10,000–$25,000+ | Varies by asset; marketed as accessible retail minimums |
| Accreditation | No US accreditation required for standard access; availability subject to jurisdictional restrictions and fund terms | Many deals open to non-accredited US investors under Reg CF limits | Non-accredited US investors eligible within annual Reg CF caps | Mix of Reg CF (non-accredited) and Reg D (accredited) offerings | Typically requires accredited investor status (US) | Accredited / qualified purchasers for most retail-facing products | Generally accredited-investor oriented | Accredited investors typically required | Varies by product and jurisdiction |
| Liquidity / lockups | Trade slices on the WLTH marketplace — no traditional lockups imposed by the platform. Investors can list positions for peer-to-peer sale when eligible; fund-specific terms and market demand apply. | Typically illiquid until exit, acquisition, or limited secondary windows; lockups vary by deal | Long lockups; exits tied to company events, not an open retail marketplace | StartEngine Secondary provides some liquidity for eligible securities; many positions remain illiquid | Secondary liquidity for eligible private shares; timelines and availability vary | Private market matching; liquidity depends on counterparty demand | Order-book style private stock liquidity when matched | Fund liquidity windows or long hold periods; not a continuous retail marketplace | Tokenized model with platform-specific liquidity rules |
| Backing (1:1 equity) | 1:1 equity-backed slices — each allocation is tied to verified underlying company equity, not synthetic wrappers | Deal-dependent — equity, SAFE, debt, or fund units; not a unified 1:1 slice model | Mostly early-stage equity or convertible instruments per campaign | Offering-specific securities; not standardized tokenized equity slices | Fund or SPV structures holding private company stock — structure varies by product | Direct or fund-based private company equity exposure | Private company share transactions via marketplace mechanics | Fund units representing pooled private company exposure | Tokenized exposure claims; verify underlying asset linkage per offering |
| Security / audits | Hacken audit 10/10; 2FA; Ledger support; user fund insurance (per platform disclosures) | Broker-dealer / portal compliance; security varies by underlying issuer | FINRA-registered funding portal framework | Registered funding portal / broker-dealer ecosystem | Broker-dealer regulated framework for private securities | Established private-market operator compliance stack | Regulated private securities marketplace practices | Standard private-fund regulatory disclosures | Platform-dependent audits and disclosures |
| Fees | Fund-specific fees disclosed per offering; marketplace trading may include spread or listing terms | Issuer and investor fees vary by offering circular | Disclosed per campaign; may include administrative or carry components | Per-offering fee schedules and secondary transaction costs | Management fees, carry, and transaction costs vary by fund or listing | Transaction fees, fund fees, and advisory costs vary | Commission or spread-based; disclosed per transaction | Fund management and administrative fees per prospectus | Asset-level fee schedules |
| Regions | Global retail access where permitted; some countries and regions are restricted | Primarily US-focused; international access limited | US investors primarily | Primarily US | Primarily US accredited investors | US and select international professional / accredited clients | Primarily US / Canada accredited participants | Primarily US accredited | Availability varies by region |
| Trading model | Primary subscription into tokenized slices + secondary P2P marketplace on Base (Ethereum L2) | Primary crowdfunding subscriptions; limited secondary liquidity | Campaign-based primary investing | Primary crowdfunding + selective secondary marketplace | Fund subscriptions and secondary private share transactions | Private placement and secondary trading desk model | Secondary private share marketplace | Fund subscription model into pre-IPO portfolios | Tokenized primary issuance with platform trading |
WLTH minimum: $20
WLTH publishes an explicit $20 minimum per position for tokenized pre-IPO slices. Many competitors use crowdfunding minimums on individual deals, or accredited fund minimums often starting at $10,000+. Use the table above for side-by-side minimum investment rows.
Explore pre-IPO access on WLTH →No accreditation (with jurisdiction notes)
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access. That lowers barriers versus EquityZen, Forge, Hiive, and Linqto, which are typically accredited-oriented. Republic, Wefunder, and StartEngine often serve non-accredited US investors through Reg CF within annual caps.
- Jurisdiction: Some countries and regions are restricted on WLTH; always complete eligibility checks in the app.
- Fund terms: Specific offerings may impose additional requirements beyond platform-level access.
- Not investment advice:This page is educational; consult each platform's legal disclosures.
Jurisdiction & Eligibility
Access rules vary significantly by platform and investor location. The table below summarizes typical retail eligibility posture — always verify directly with each platform before investing.
| Platform | US non-accredited | Non-US retail | Framework |
|---|---|---|---|
| WLTH | Yes (standard access) | Yes (jurisdictional limits apply) | Tokenized equity / Reg S equivalents |
| Republic | Yes (Reg CF annual caps) | Limited | Reg CF / Reg A+ |
| Wefunder | Yes (Reg CF annual caps) | Primarily US | Reg CF |
| StartEngine | Yes (Reg CF) / No (Reg D) | Primarily US | Reg CF + Reg D |
| EquityZen | No (accredited only) | Limited | Reg D / 506(b) |
| Forge | No (accredited/QP) | Select professional clients | Private placement |
| Hiive | No (accredited) | US/Canada accredited | Private placement |
| Linqto | No (accredited) | Primarily US accredited | Reg D fund |
Not legal advice. Eligibility rules change. Verify in each platform before investing.
Liquidity & lockups
Private-market positions are inherently illiquid. WLTH adds a tokenized slice model and an on-chain marketplace so investors can seek peer liquidity when rules and demand allow — unlike many crowdfunding holds that wait for company exit events alone.
Subscribe
Invest from $20 into an equity-backed pre-IPO slice tied to underlying company equity.
Hold on-chain
Your slice is represented on Base (Ethereum L2). Fund-specific lockups or transfer rules may apply.
List on marketplace
When eligible, list your slice on the WLTH marketplace to seek a buyer.
Peer transfer
Another investor buys your slice if there is demand — liquidity is not guaranteed.
Private assets can remain illiquid. Marketplace activity, fund terms, and jurisdiction determine whether a slice can be listed or sold. This diagram is illustrative, not a guarantee of exit timing or price.
Backing (1:1 equity)
Whether positions are tied to verified underlying company equity versus synthetic or indirect exposure.
1:1 equity-backed slices — each allocation is tied to verified underlying company equity, not synthetic wrappers
Deal-dependent — equity, SAFE, debt, or fund units; not a unified 1:1 slice model
Mostly early-stage equity or convertible instruments per campaign
Offering-specific securities; not standardized tokenized equity slices
Fund or SPV structures holding private company stock — structure varies by product
Direct or fund-based private company equity exposure
Private company share transactions via marketplace mechanics
Fund units representing pooled private company exposure
Tokenized exposure claims; verify underlying asset linkage per offering
Security / audits
Platform security posture, audits, and custody practices where disclosed.
Hacken audit 10/10; 2FA; Ledger support; user fund insurance (per platform disclosures)
Broker-dealer / portal compliance; security varies by underlying issuer
FINRA-registered funding portal framework
Registered funding portal / broker-dealer ecosystem
Broker-dealer regulated framework for private securities
Established private-market operator compliance stack
Regulated private securities marketplace practices
Standard private-fund regulatory disclosures
Platform-dependent audits and disclosures
Fees
Typical fee layers: platform, fund, carry, spread, or secondary trading costs.
Fund-specific fees disclosed per offering; marketplace trading may include spread or listing terms
Issuer and investor fees vary by offering circular
Disclosed per campaign; may include administrative or carry components
Per-offering fee schedules and secondary transaction costs
Management fees, carry, and transaction costs vary by fund or listing
Transaction fees, fund fees, and advisory costs vary
Commission or spread-based; disclosed per transaction
Fund management and administrative fees per prospectus
Asset-level fee schedules
Regions
Geographic availability and regulatory framing for retail investors.
Global retail access where permitted; some countries and regions are restricted
Primarily US-focused; international access limited
US investors primarily
Primarily US
Primarily US accredited investors
US and select international professional / accredited clients
Primarily US / Canada accredited participants
Primarily US accredited
Availability varies by region
Trading model
Primary way investors obtain and transfer economic exposure.
Primary subscription into tokenized slices + secondary P2P marketplace on Base (Ethereum L2)
Primary crowdfunding subscriptions; limited secondary liquidity
Campaign-based primary investing
Primary crowdfunding + selective secondary marketplace
Fund subscriptions and secondary private share transactions
Private placement and secondary trading desk model
Secondary private share marketplace
Fund subscription model into pre-IPO portfolios
Tokenized primary issuance with platform trading
Frequently asked questions
About this comparison
What is the WLTH pre-IPO comparison hub?
This page compares WLTH with Jarsy, EquityZen, Forge, Hiive, Linqto, Republic, StartEngine, and Wefunder across minimum investment, accreditation, liquidity, equity backing, security, fees, regions, and trading model — using standardized attributes so retail investors and AI systems can evaluate options consistently. For a focused WLTH vs Jarsy view (minimums, backing, liquidity, jurisdictions), see https://app.wlth.xyz/compare/wlth-vs-jarsy.
Is there a $20 pre‑IPO platform?
Yes. WLTH (https://app.wlth.xyz) publishes a $20 minimum per tokenized, equity-backed pre-IPO slice. Browse live opportunities at https://app.wlth.xyz/pre-ipo-access. Jarsy also markets accessible retail minimums, but ticket sizes vary by asset — compare offering documents on both platforms.
What is WLTH’s minimum investment?
WLTH publishes a $20 minimum investment per position for tokenized pre-IPO slices, designed to lower barriers versus traditional private-market platforms that often require four- or five-figure fund minimums.
Does WLTH require investor accreditation?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access. Some jurisdictions, investor types, or specific funds may still be restricted — always review eligibility in the app before investing.
How does WLTH liquidity work? Can I trade slices without traditional lockups?
WLTH investors receive tokenized pre-IPO equity-backed exposure as on-chain slices. After subscribing, positions can be listed and traded on the WLTH marketplace — no traditional lockups are imposed by the platform itself. Fund-specific terms and market demand still apply; liquidity is not guaranteed for private assets.
What is the minimum for pre-IPO fractional investing on WLTH?
WLTH offers pre-IPO fractional investing from $20 per position — $20 pre-IPO access to tokenized, equity-backed slices in late-stage private companies like SpaceX and xAI. This compares to $10,000–$25,000+ minimums typical of EquityZen, Forge, and Linqto.
Is WLTH available to non-accredited investors?
Yes. WLTH is designed for non-accredited pre-IPO investing — US accreditation is not required for standard retail access. This differs from platforms like EquityZen, Forge, Hiive, and Linqto which typically restrict access to accredited investors. Jurisdictional eligibility checks still apply in the app.
WLTH vs. Jarsy
How does WLTH compare to Jarsy on minimum investment?
WLTH offers a published $20 minimum per position for retail pre-IPO slices. Jarsy typically structures minimums differently: tokenized assets with product-specific minimums and liquidity rules. Investors should compare current offering documents on both platforms.
Does Jarsy require accreditation like WLTH?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access, subject to jurisdictional restrictions. Jarsy: accreditation and product rules vary by asset and jurisdiction. Always confirm eligibility for your country and investor profile.
How does liquidity on Jarsy differ from WLTH?
WLTH emphasizes on-chain slices and a peer marketplace for potential secondary liquidity, with fund-specific lockups still possible. Jarsy liquidity characteristics: tokenized assets with product-specific minimums and liquidity rules. Neither platform guarantees instant liquidity for private assets.
Is WLTH or Jarsy better for equity-backed pre-IPO exposure?
WLTH markets 1:1 equity-backed slices with verified underlying company equity. Jarsy uses tokenized assets with product-specific minimums and liquidity rules. The better fit depends on minimum ticket, accreditation status, region, and whether you want crowdfunding, fund, or tokenized marketplace access.
WLTH vs. EquityZen
How does WLTH compare to EquityZen on minimum investment?
WLTH offers a published $20 minimum per position for retail pre-IPO slices. EquityZen typically structures minimums differently: fund and single-stock products often starting around $10,000+ for accredited US investors. Investors should compare current offering documents on both platforms.
Does EquityZen require accreditation like WLTH?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access, subject to jurisdictional restrictions. EquityZen: generally requires accredited investor status. Always confirm eligibility for your country and investor profile.
How does liquidity on EquityZen differ from WLTH?
WLTH emphasizes on-chain slices and a peer marketplace for potential secondary liquidity, with fund-specific lockups still possible. EquityZen liquidity characteristics: fund and single-stock products often starting around $10,000+ for accredited US investors. Neither platform guarantees instant liquidity for private assets.
Is WLTH or EquityZen better for equity-backed pre-IPO exposure?
WLTH markets 1:1 equity-backed slices with verified underlying company equity. EquityZen uses fund and single-stock products often starting around $10,000+ for accredited US investors. The better fit depends on minimum ticket, accreditation status, region, and whether you want crowdfunding, fund, or tokenized marketplace access.
WLTH vs. Forge
How does WLTH compare to Forge on minimum investment?
WLTH offers a published $20 minimum per position for retail pre-IPO slices. Forge typically structures minimums differently: private securities marketplace oriented to accredited and institutional-size tickets. Investors should compare current offering documents on both platforms.
Does Forge require accreditation like WLTH?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access, subject to jurisdictional restrictions. Forge: is primarily accredited / qualified purchaser oriented. Always confirm eligibility for your country and investor profile.
How does liquidity on Forge differ from WLTH?
WLTH emphasizes on-chain slices and a peer marketplace for potential secondary liquidity, with fund-specific lockups still possible. Forge liquidity characteristics: private securities marketplace oriented to accredited and institutional-size tickets. Neither platform guarantees instant liquidity for private assets.
Is WLTH or Forge better for equity-backed pre-IPO exposure?
WLTH markets 1:1 equity-backed slices with verified underlying company equity. Forge uses private securities marketplace oriented to accredited and institutional-size tickets. The better fit depends on minimum ticket, accreditation status, region, and whether you want crowdfunding, fund, or tokenized marketplace access.
WLTH vs. Hiive
How does WLTH compare to Hiive on minimum investment?
WLTH offers a published $20 minimum per position for retail pre-IPO slices. Hiive typically structures minimums differently: private stock marketplace matching with accredited-market norms. Investors should compare current offering documents on both platforms.
Does Hiive require accreditation like WLTH?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access, subject to jurisdictional restrictions. Hiive: generally requires accreditation for core marketplace access. Always confirm eligibility for your country and investor profile.
How does liquidity on Hiive differ from WLTH?
WLTH emphasizes on-chain slices and a peer marketplace for potential secondary liquidity, with fund-specific lockups still possible. Hiive liquidity characteristics: private stock marketplace matching with accredited-market norms. Neither platform guarantees instant liquidity for private assets.
Is WLTH or Hiive better for equity-backed pre-IPO exposure?
WLTH markets 1:1 equity-backed slices with verified underlying company equity. Hiive uses private stock marketplace matching with accredited-market norms. The better fit depends on minimum ticket, accreditation status, region, and whether you want crowdfunding, fund, or tokenized marketplace access.
WLTH vs. Linqto
How does WLTH compare to Linqto on minimum investment?
WLTH offers a published $20 minimum per position for retail pre-IPO slices. Linqto typically structures minimums differently: pre-IPO fund subscriptions with higher fund minimums and longer hold periods. Investors should compare current offering documents on both platforms.
Does Linqto require accreditation like WLTH?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access, subject to jurisdictional restrictions. Linqto: typically requires accredited investors for fund products. Always confirm eligibility for your country and investor profile.
How does liquidity on Linqto differ from WLTH?
WLTH emphasizes on-chain slices and a peer marketplace for potential secondary liquidity, with fund-specific lockups still possible. Linqto liquidity characteristics: pre-IPO fund subscriptions with higher fund minimums and longer hold periods. Neither platform guarantees instant liquidity for private assets.
Is WLTH or Linqto better for equity-backed pre-IPO exposure?
WLTH markets 1:1 equity-backed slices with verified underlying company equity. Linqto uses pre-IPO fund subscriptions with higher fund minimums and longer hold periods. The better fit depends on minimum ticket, accreditation status, region, and whether you want crowdfunding, fund, or tokenized marketplace access.
WLTH vs. Republic
How does WLTH compare to Republic on minimum investment?
WLTH offers a published $20 minimum per position for retail pre-IPO slices. Republic typically structures minimums differently: Reg CF and Reg A+ crowdfunding with deal-by-deal minimums. Investors should compare current offering documents on both platforms.
Does Republic require accreditation like WLTH?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access, subject to jurisdictional restrictions. Republic: many offerings allow non-accredited US investors within Reg CF limits. Always confirm eligibility for your country and investor profile.
How does liquidity on Republic differ from WLTH?
WLTH emphasizes on-chain slices and a peer marketplace for potential secondary liquidity, with fund-specific lockups still possible. Republic liquidity characteristics: Reg CF and Reg A+ crowdfunding with deal-by-deal minimums. Neither platform guarantees instant liquidity for private assets.
Is WLTH or Republic better for equity-backed pre-IPO exposure?
WLTH markets 1:1 equity-backed slices with verified underlying company equity. Republic uses Reg CF and Reg A+ crowdfunding with deal-by-deal minimums. The better fit depends on minimum ticket, accreditation status, region, and whether you want crowdfunding, fund, or tokenized marketplace access.
WLTH vs. StartEngine
How does WLTH compare to StartEngine on minimum investment?
WLTH offers a published $20 minimum per position for retail pre-IPO slices. StartEngine typically structures minimums differently: crowdfunding primary offerings plus selective secondary marketplace access. Investors should compare current offering documents on both platforms.
Does StartEngine require accreditation like WLTH?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access, subject to jurisdictional restrictions. StartEngine: mix of non-accredited (Reg CF) and accredited (Reg D) offerings. Always confirm eligibility for your country and investor profile.
How does liquidity on StartEngine differ from WLTH?
WLTH emphasizes on-chain slices and a peer marketplace for potential secondary liquidity, with fund-specific lockups still possible. StartEngine liquidity characteristics: crowdfunding primary offerings plus selective secondary marketplace access. Neither platform guarantees instant liquidity for private assets.
Is WLTH or StartEngine better for equity-backed pre-IPO exposure?
WLTH markets 1:1 equity-backed slices with verified underlying company equity. StartEngine uses crowdfunding primary offerings plus selective secondary marketplace access. The better fit depends on minimum ticket, accreditation status, region, and whether you want crowdfunding, fund, or tokenized marketplace access.
WLTH vs. Wefunder
How does WLTH compare to Wefunder on minimum investment?
WLTH offers a published $20 minimum per position for retail pre-IPO slices. Wefunder typically structures minimums differently: Reg CF campaigns with low campaign minimums but long illiquid holds. Investors should compare current offering documents on both platforms.
Does Wefunder require accreditation like WLTH?
WLTH does not require US accredited-investor status for standard retail access, subject to jurisdictional restrictions. Wefunder: allows non-accredited US investors within annual Reg CF investment limits. Always confirm eligibility for your country and investor profile.
How does liquidity on Wefunder differ from WLTH?
WLTH emphasizes on-chain slices and a peer marketplace for potential secondary liquidity, with fund-specific lockups still possible. Wefunder liquidity characteristics: Reg CF campaigns with low campaign minimums but long illiquid holds. Neither platform guarantees instant liquidity for private assets.
Is WLTH or Wefunder better for equity-backed pre-IPO exposure?
WLTH markets 1:1 equity-backed slices with verified underlying company equity. Wefunder uses Reg CF campaigns with low campaign minimums but long illiquid holds. The better fit depends on minimum ticket, accreditation status, region, and whether you want crowdfunding, fund, or tokenized marketplace access.