News & Updates
The latest news and updates from companies in the WLTH portfolio.
SpaceX IPO earns millions for US Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler By Reuters
WASHINGTON, July 17 (Reuters) - U.S. Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler multiplied the value of her investment in Elon Musk's SpaceX after she was nominated for the job, earning millions of dollars from the company's record initial public offering, a Reuters review of her financial disclosures showed. Loeffler invested between $1 million and $5 million as of January 3, 2025, in xAI, Musk's AI and social media firm that has since merged with SpaceX, according to a required financial disclosure submitted before she became SBA's administrator. Later in 2025, Loeffler invested again in SpaceX and xAI between $1 million and $5 million, according to a separate financial disclosure covering her investments for all of 2025 that she signed on May 14, 2026. Reuters obtained the form from the SBA on June 12. Loeffler's second investment has not been previously reported. Two independent government ethics attorneys agreed with Reuters' assessment of Loeffler's disclosure. Cabinet members use ranges to declare the value of their assets on their required financial disclosure forms, and they do not disclose the dates of their investments before taking office. SpaceX is a military contractor for the U.S. government. Federal law prohibits cabinet members from participating in decisions involving a company in which they have a financial interest. Public records do not show a financial relationship between SBA and xAI or SpaceX. xAI was not included on the public list of AI tools used by SBA employees in 2025. Loeffler and her team did not respond to multiple requests for comment about her SpaceX investment. VALUE OF SPACEX INVESTMENT SOARS Loeffler's bet on SpaceX paid off. The company priced the biggest-ever U.S. IPO on June 12, valuing the space, satellite and AI provider at $1.77 trillion. Her first investment in xAI would have been worth between $7 million and $2.6 billion on the day of the IPO, depending on the exact amount she invested and the date she made it, said Franco Granda, analyst at data provider PitchBook. The second investment would have been worth between $2.2 million and $25.4 million that day, he said. The earlier the investment, the more it would have been worth at the IPO, he said. xAI's valuation increased by more than 7,000% between its first investment round and January 5, 2025. SpaceX's valuation more than doubled in 2025. At least 10 Trump administration officials listed investments in SpaceX or xAI on their 2025 financial disclosure forms. None of those officials works for the Defense Department. Billionaire Musk, a former Trump adviser, is the founder and CEO of SpaceX. Loeffler initially invested in xAI via a private placement, according to her disclosure form. Private placements are typically open to select individuals and institutions with significant financial resources. Loeffler is a wealthy businesswoman. She was the founding chief executive at Bakkt, a bitcoin trading platform, and spent 16 years working at Intercontinental Exchange, the firm that owns the New York Stock Exchange, according to her LinkedIn profile. She is married to Intercontinental Exchange CEO Jeffrey Sprecher. Loeffler briefly represented Georgia in the Senate. The SBA helps entrepreneurs start and build their small businesses, according to the agency website. It connects business owners with lenders and funding to help them recover from natural disasters, among other responsibilities. The Senate confirmed Loeffler as SBA administrator on February 19, 2025.
SpaceX IPO earns millions for US Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler
WASHINGTON, July 17 (Reuters) - U.S. Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler multiplied the value of her investment in Elon Musk's SpaceX after she was nominated for the job, earning millions of dollars from the company's record initial public offering, a Reuters review of her financial disclosures showed. Loeffler invested between $1 million and $5 million as of January 3, 2025, in xAI, Musk's AI and social media firm that has since merged with SpaceX (SPCX.O), opens new tab, according to a required financial disclosure submitted before she became SBA's administrator. Later in 2025, Loeffler invested again in SpaceX and xAI between $1 million and $5 million, according to a separate financial disclosure covering her investments for all of 2025 that she signed on May 14, 2026. Reuters obtained the form from the SBA on June 12. Loeffler's second investment has not been previously reported. Two independent government ethics attorneys agreed with Reuters' assessment of Loeffler's disclosure. Cabinet members use ranges to declare the value of their assets on their required financial disclosure forms, and they do not disclose the dates of their investments before taking office. SpaceX is a military contractor for the U.S. government. Federal law, opens new tab prohibits cabinet members from participating in decisions involving a company in which they have a financial interest. Public records do not show a financial relationship between SBA and xAI or SpaceX. xAI was not included on the public list of AI tools, opens new tab used by SBA employees in 2025. Loeffler and her team did not respond to multiple requests for comment about her SpaceX investment. VALUE OF SPACEX INVESTMENT SOARS Loeffler's bet on SpaceX paid off. The company priced the biggest-ever U.S. IPO on June 12, valuing the space, satellite and AI provider at $1.77 trillion. Her first investment in xAI would have been worth between $7 million and $2.6 billion on the day of the IPO, depending on the exact amount she invested and the date she made it, said Franco Granda, analyst at data provider PitchBook. The second investment would have been worth between $2.2 million and $25.4 million that day, he said. The earlier the investment, the more it would have been worth at the IPO, he said. xAI's valuation increased by more than 7,000% between its first investment round and January 5, 2025. SpaceX's valuation more than doubled in 2025. At least 10 Trump administration officials listed investments in SpaceX or xAI on their 2025 financial disclosure forms. None of those officials works for the Defense Department. Billionaire Musk, a former Trump adviser, is the founder and CEO of SpaceX. Loeffler initially invested in xAI via a private placement, according to her disclosure form. Private placements are typically open to select individuals and institutions with significant financial resources. Loeffler is a wealthy businesswoman. She was the founding chief executive at Bakkt, a bitcoin trading platform, and spent 16 years working at Intercontinental Exchange, the firm that owns the New York Stock Exchange, according to her LinkedIn profile. She is married to Intercontinental Exchange CEO Jeffrey Sprecher. Loeffler briefly represented Georgia in the Senate. The SBA helps entrepreneurs start and build their small businesses, according to the agency website. It connects business owners with lenders and funding to help them recover from natural disasters, among other responsibilities. The Senate confirmed Loeffler as SBA administrator on February 19, 2025. Reporting by Courtney Rozen Editing by Chris Sanders and Rod Nickel Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles., opens new tab * Suggested Topics: * Artificial Intelligence Courtney Rozen Thomson Reuters Courtney Rozen reports on the world's largest technology companies from Washington, D.C., focusing on the relationship between the tech industry and the U.S. government. She reported on DOGE and the federal workforce during the first year of U.S. President Donald Trump's second term. Prior to joining Reuters, she was a White House correspondent at Bloomberg Government. She graduated from American University with a master's degree in journalism.
SpaceX IPO earns millions for US Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. WASHINGTON, July 17 (Reuters) - U.S. Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler multiplied the value of her investment in Elon Musk's SpaceX after she was nominated for the job, earning millions of dollars from the company's record initial public offering, a Reuters review of her financial disclosures showed. Loeffler invested between $1 million and $5 million as of January 3, 2025, in xAI, Musk's AI and social media firm that has since merged with SpaceX, according to a required financial disclosure submitted before she became SBA's administrator. Later in 2025, Loeffler invested again in SpaceX and xAI between $1 million and $5 million, according to a separate financial disclosure covering her investments for all of 2025 that she signed on May 14, 2026. Reuters obtained the form from the SBA on June 12. Loeffler's second investment has not been previously reported. Two independent government ethics attorneys agreed with Reuters' assessment of Loeffler's disclosure. Cabinet members use ranges to declare the value of their assets on their required financial disclosure forms, and they do not disclose the dates of their investments before taking office. SpaceX is a military contractor for the U.S. government. Federal law prohibits cabinet members from participating in decisions involving a company in which they have a financial interest. Public records do not show a financial relationship between SBA and xAI or SpaceX. xAI was not included on the public list of AI tools used by SBA employees in 2025. Loeffler and her team did not respond to multiple requests for comment about her SpaceX investment. VALUE OF SPACEX INVESTMENT SOARS Loeffler's bet on SpaceX paid off. The company priced the biggest-ever U.S. IPO on June 12, valuing the space, satellite and AI provider at $1.77 trillion. Her first investment in xAI would have been worth between $7 million and $2.6 billion on the day of the IPO, depending on the exact amount she invested and the date she made it, said Franco Granda, analyst at data provider PitchBook. The second investment would have been worth between $2.2 million and $25.4 million that day, he said. The earlier the investment, the more it would have been worth at the IPO, he said. xAI's valuation increased by more than 7,000% between its first investment round and January 5, 2025. SpaceX's valuation more than doubled in 2025. At least 10 Trump administration officials listed investments in SpaceX or xAI on their 2025 financial disclosure forms. None of those officials works for the Defense Department. Billionaire Musk, a former Trump adviser, is the founder and CEO of SpaceX. Loeffler initially invested in xAI via a private placement, according to her disclosure form. Private placements are typically open to select individuals and institutions with significant financial resources. Loeffler is a wealthy businesswoman. She was the founding chief executive at Bakkt, a bitcoin trading platform, and spent 16 years working at Intercontinental Exchange, the firm that owns the New York Stock Exchange, according to her LinkedIn profile. She is married to Intercontinental Exchange CEO Jeffrey Sprecher. Loeffler briefly represented Georgia in the Senate. The SBA helps entrepreneurs start and build their small businesses, according to the agency website. It connects business owners with lenders and funding to help them recover from natural disasters, among other responsibilities. The Senate confirmed Loeffler as SBA administrator on February 19, 2025. (Reporting by Courtney RozenEditing by Chris Sanders and Rod Nickel)
SpaceX IPO earns millions for US Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler
Add Yahoo as a preferred source to see more of our stories on Google. WASHINGTON, July 17 (Reuters) - U.S. Small Business Administration head Kelly Loeffler multiplied the value of her investment in Elon Musk's SpaceX after she was nominated for the job, earning millions of dollars from the company's record initial public offering, a Reuters review of her financial disclosures showed. Loeffler invested between $1 million and $5 million as of January 3, 2025, in xAI, Musk's AI and social media firm that has since merged with SpaceX, according to a required financial disclosure submitted before she became SBA's administrator. Later in 2025, Loeffler invested again in SpaceX and xAI between $1 million and $5 million, according to a separate financial disclosure covering her investments for all of 2025 that she signed on May 14, 2026. Reuters obtained the form from the SBA on June 12. Loeffler's second investment has not been previously reported. Two independent government ethics attorneys agreed with Reuters' assessment of Loeffler's disclosure. Cabinet members use ranges to declare the value of their assets on their required financial disclosure forms, and they do not disclose the dates of their investments before taking office. SpaceX is a military contractor for the U.S. government. Federal law prohibits cabinet members from participating in decisions involving a company in which they have a financial interest. Public records do not show a financial relationship between SBA and xAI or SpaceX. xAI was not included on the public list of AI tools used by SBA employees in 2025. Loeffler and her team did not respond to multiple requests for comment about her SpaceX investment. VALUE OF SPACEX INVESTMENT SOARS Loeffler's bet on SpaceX paid off. The company priced the biggest-ever U.S. IPO on June 12, valuing the space, satellite and AI provider at $1.77 trillion. Her first investment in xAI would have been worth between $7 million and $2.6 billion on the day of the IPO, depending on the exact amount she invested and the date she made it, said Franco Granda, analyst at data provider PitchBook. The second investment would have been worth between $2.2 million and $25.4 million that day, he said. The earlier the investment, the more it would have been worth at the IPO, he said. xAI's valuation increased by more than 7,000% between its first investment round and January 5, 2025. SpaceX's valuation more than doubled in 2025. At least 10 Trump administration officials listed investments in SpaceX or xAI on their 2025 financial disclosure forms. None of those officials works for the Defense Department. Billionaire Musk, a former Trump adviser, is the founder and CEO of SpaceX. Loeffler initially invested in xAI via a private placement, according to her disclosure form. Private placements are typically open to select individuals and institutions with significant financial resources. Loeffler is a wealthy businesswoman. She was the founding chief executive at Bakkt, a bitcoin trading platform, and spent 16 years working at Intercontinental Exchange, the firm that owns the New York Stock Exchange, according to her LinkedIn profile. She is married to Intercontinental Exchange CEO Jeffrey Sprecher. Loeffler briefly represented Georgia in the Senate. The SBA helps entrepreneurs start and build their small businesses, according to the agency website. It connects business owners with lenders and funding to help them recover from natural disasters, among other responsibilities. The Senate confirmed Loeffler as SBA administrator on February 19, 2025. (Reporting by Courtney RozenEditing by Chris Sanders and Rod Nickel)
xAI reportedly loses all 11 co-founders: turnover surges
Former staff cite long hours, top-down decisions and looming layoffs xAI, the Elon Musk AI company behind Grok, is reportedly dealing with a talent problem. Reports say all 11 original co-founders are gone, and staff turnover more broadly has been described as unusually high. Former employees describe xAI as a hard place to work: long hours, decisions concentrated at the top, not much tolerance for disagreement, and constant churn. People watching the company say that could start to show up in execution, hiring, and enterprise credibility, even after reports of a $20 billion raise at roughly a $230 billion valuation and a February 2026 merger with SpaceX that reportedly put the combined company near $1.25 trillion. Reports also say xAI has measured Grok against Claude, Anthropic's competing model, especially on coding. Inside the company, there was said to be frustration that Grok lagged behind. There were also allegations that Claude outputs were used to improve xAI's coding systems, including claims that some employees kept relying on personal Anthropic accounts after official access had been cut off. xAI was also reportedly preparing layoffs of as much as 30% in March 2026, though other reports put the cuts at more than 70%. All of that landed while Grok was already taking heat over deepfake sexual images, misinformation, and a July 2026 allegation that one coding tool sent entire code repositories to the cloud without clear consent. If you follow Grok closely, keep an eye on this. The next round of xAI news will likely come down to one question: can the company behind Grok get itself steady?
SpaceX stock erases all its gains and slides below IPO price in intraday trading
SpaceX stock dropped below its initial public offering price for the first time on Wednesday, signaling dwindling hype around the Elon Musk company. Shares dipped below their IPO price of $135 on Wednesday morning for the first time since listing, a humbling loss for the stock, which had skyrocketed more than 50% in its first days of trading last month. The shares regained some ground later in the day, closing at $135.27. The initial offering gave the company a market cap of $2.2 trillion, making it one of the world's most valuable public companies. For a short period, the IPO also made owner Elon Musk the world's first trillionaire, though his net worth now is about $800 billion. On July 7, the company was added to the Nasdaq-100 after a rule change allowed companies to join 15 days after their IPOs. SpaceX raised a total of $86 billion after underwriters exercised their right to sell additional shares, on top of the $75 billion initially raised. It was the largest IPO in history. SpaceX, based near Austin, Texas, is the leading launch services company in the world, with its Falcon 9 rocket accounting for the vast majority of satellites launched last year. It is also the leading satellite-based broadband provider with its Starlink service. The extraordinary interest in the IPO was driven by Musk's plans to make the company an AI leader -- including plans to launch orbiting satellite data centers powered by the sun that crunch AI data. The company's headquarters moved from Hawthorne to Texas in 2024, but it retains large operations in the South Bay city and blasts off regularly from Vandenberg Space Force Base in Santa Barbara County. Since the IPO, SpaceX has used its newfound wealth to expand in the AI space. It announced last month that it was acquiring the AI coding startup Cursor for $60 billion, with the deal expected to close in the third quarter. The San Francisco company, founded in 2022, enables engineers to instruct software in English to run coding tasks autonomously. Musk also merged his xAI artificial intelligence company into SpaceX earlier this year. The combined entity recently announced it was leasing computing power to rivals Anthropic and Google at two terrestrial data centers it has constructed. Since the IPO, investors have expressed concerns about the company's spending plans and debt load. Even with the volatility of the last month, there's still more uncertainty to come. The stock could fall further as locked-up shares held by current and former employees are released.
SpaceX stock erases all its gains and slides below IPO price in intraday trading
See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred SpaceX stock dropped below its initial public offering price for the first time on Wednesday, signaling dwindling hype around the Elon Musk company. Shares dipped below their IPO price of $135 on Wednesday morning for the first time since listing, a humbling loss for the stock, which had skyrocketed more than 50% in its first days of trading last month. The shares regained some ground later in the day, closing at $135.27. The initial offering gave the company a market cap of $2.2 trillion, making it one of the world's most valuable public companies. For a short period, the IPO also made owner Elon Musk the world's first trillionaire, though his net worth now is about $800 billion. On July 7, the company was added to the Nasdaq-100 after a rule change allowed companies to join 15 days after their IPOs. SpaceX raised a total of $86 billion after underwriters exercised their right to sell additional shares, on top of the $75 billion initially raised. It was the largest IPO in history. SpaceX, based near Austin, Texas, is the leading launch services company in the world, with its Falcon 9 rocket accounting for the vast majority of satellites launched last year. It is also the leading satellite-based broadband provider with its Starlink service. The extraordinary interest in the IPO was driven by Musk's plans to make the company an AI leader -- including plans to launch orbiting satellite data centers powered by the sun that crunch AI data. The company's headquarters moved from Hawthorne to Texas in 2024, but it retains large operations in the South Bay city and blasts off regularly from Vandenberg Space Force Base in Santa Barbara County. Since the IPO, SpaceX has used its newfound wealth to expand in the AI space. It announced last month that it was acquiring the AI coding startup Cursor for $60 billion, with the deal expected to close in the third quarter. The San Francisco company, founded in 2022, enables engineers to instruct software in English to run coding tasks autonomously. Musk also merged his xAI artificial intelligence company into SpaceX earlier this year. The combined entity recently announced it was leasing computing power to rivals Anthropic and Google at two terrestrial data centers it has constructed. Since the IPO, investors have expressed concerns about the company's spending plans and debt load. Even with the volatility of the last month, there's still more uncertainty to come. The stock could fall further as locked-up shares held by current and former employees are released. At least 20% of the shares will be released after second-quarter results are disclosed sometime in the coming months, with all the lockups expiring in December. But Space X isn't the only megacap stock to experience ups and downs early on. Shares of Meta, then named Facebook, fell significantly below the IPO price of $38 before recovering. After its May 2012 launch, shares plummeted by nearly 50% and hit a record low of $19.69 in August 2012. The company took more than 14 months to rebound, finally surpassing its $38 IPO price in July 2013.
Traders cool on Tesla-SpaceX merger as Polymarket odds slide
Traders on Polymarket have sharply scaled back bets that a Tesla-SpaceX merger will be announced this year, even as Wall Street analysts insist a tie-up is only a matter of time. The prediction market now puts just an 11% chance on an official announcement by 30 September, down 28 percentage points, while the odds of a deal being unveiled by 31 December have fallen 19 points to 24%. More than $836,000 has been wagered across the market, which resolves yes if either company announces it is being acquired by or merged with the other, regardless of whether the deal completes. The retreat contrasts with bullish calls from analysts, with Wedbush's Dan Ives putting the odds of a Tesla-SpaceX tie-up at about 80% and arguing the connective tissue between the companies is already forming. Speculation intensified after SpaceX's $85.7 billion initial public offering, which created a company now valued at around $2.44 trillion with $100.8 billion in cash. SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell declined to dismiss the idea when asked directly in June, suggesting a tie-up might make Elon Musk's life a little easier. Musk has exercised 304 million Tesla options, lifting his voting stake to 19.9% as he targets the 25% control he says is needed to advance the carmaker's AI ambitions. The two companies already share extensive commercial ties, including joint ownership of the Terafab chip facility, and SpaceX bought $697 million of Tesla's Megapack battery systems in 2024 and 2025. Musk has form for consolidation, having folded social media platform X into xAI in 2025 before SpaceX acquired xAI in an all-stock deal this year. Musk himself has acknowledged the complexity, telling analysts that any deal would have to make sure Tesla shareholders are served and SpaceX shareholders are served.
Traders cool on Tesla-SpaceX merger as Polymarket odds slide
Traders on Polymarket have sharply scaled back bets that a Tesla-SpaceX merger will be announced this year, even as Wall Street analysts insist a tie-up is only a matter of time. The prediction market now puts just an 11% chance on an official announcement by 30 September, down 28 percentage points, while the odds of a deal being unveiled by 31 December have fallen 19 points to 24%. More than $836,000 has been wagered across the market, which resolves yes if either company announces it is being acquired by or merged with the other, regardless of whether the deal completes. The retreat contrasts with bullish calls from analysts, with Wedbush's Dan Ives putting the odds of a Tesla-SpaceX tie-up at about 80% and arguing the connective tissue between the companies is already forming. Speculation intensified after SpaceX's $85.7 billion initial public offering, which created a company now valued at around $2.44 trillion with $100.8 billion in cash. SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell declined to dismiss the idea when asked directly in June, suggesting a tie-up might make Elon Musk's life a little easier. Musk has exercised 304 million Tesla options, lifting his voting stake to 19.9% as he targets the 25% control he says is needed to advance the carmaker's AI ambitions. The two companies already share extensive commercial ties, including joint ownership of the Terafab chip facility, and SpaceX bought $697 million of Tesla's Megapack battery systems in 2024 and 2025. Musk has form for consolidation, having folded social media platform X into xAI in 2025 before SpaceX acquired xAI in an all-stock deal this year. Musk himself has acknowledged the complexity, telling analysts that any deal would have to make sure Tesla shareholders are served and SpaceX shareholders are served.
xAI sues Grok user over AI-generated explicit imagery of minors - Cryptopolitan
he outcome could set a template for how the industry handles users who weaponize generative tools. Elon Musk's xAI has taken a South Carolina man to federal court in Texas, accusing him of using the Grok chatbot to create sexually explicit deepfakes of minors, marking the very first time an AI company will sue one of its own users over content generated using its platform. The defendant, Terry Harwood, was arrested in February on separate charges of sexually exploiting minors, according to Reuters. xAI's civil complaint was filed on Tuesday April 14, and will now be alongside whatever criminal case develops from that arrest. xAI's lawsuit The filing says that he opened several accounts under fake identities, and then fed the AI tool regular photographs of both adults and children before writing prompts meant to turn those images into sexual content. According to Al Jazeera, the subjects used in these acts had not consented and did not know their pictures were being used. xAI claims the system pushed back against the act. Grok refused the requests, flagging them as violations of its content rules. Harwood's response, according to the complaint, was to keep rewriting the prompts and trying again. "Defendant's actions were a calculated scheme to weaponize Plaintiff's tool for criminal ends, exposing real victims to profound and lasting harm," xAI wrote in the lawsuit, quoted by Reuters. The company also alleges he produced non-consensual sexual images of adults. The AI company requested two things from the court in the lawsuit filing. These include monetary damages with no particular figure attached, and an order that bars Harwood from ever using the Grok product again. xAI also used the filing to state the scale of its enforcement work against bad actors. The company said it suspended 52,222 accounts this year and sent 73,604 reports to the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, referrals that led to at least 244 arrests in 2026. Grok remains under wider scrutiny xAI had already been under pressure over what Grok can produce before this case came up. Regulators in Europe have scrutinized the AI tool, while lawmakers in Washington have raised multiple concerns. Both Malaysia and Indonesia have banned the chatbot due to sexually explicit output, Al Jazeera reported. Elon Musk himself denied the underlying problem earlier this year. "I [am] not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero," he wrote on X in January. I not aware of any naked underage images generated by Grok. Literally zero. Obviously, Grok does not spontaneously generate images, it does so only according to user requests. When asked to generate images, it will refuse to produce anything illegal, as the operating principle... https://t.co/YBoqo7ZmEj -- Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 14, 2026 A recently created legal pathway called the DEFIANCE Act has also led to an increase in these such cases. The act, signed in 2024, gives victims of non-consensual intimate deepfakes a way to sue, and several states have passed individual laws to this effect.
Elon Musk promises 'no exceptions' after Sam Altman's one word response on xAI's Grok 'uploading' customer code to its own servers
Elon Musk has promised total transparency after a security researcher revealed that xAI's coding assistant, Grok Build, was secretly uploading entire private customer code repositories to a company-controlled Google Cloud storage bucket. In response, the billionaire promised to make the entire codebase of X (formerly Twitter) open source with "no exceptions". Musk's push for absolute transparency follows a sharp online critique from rival OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who publicly labeled the data privacy issue as "concerning"."Once we have completed our review for security vulnerabilities, we will make the entire codebase of 𝕏 open source, with no exceptions," Musk said in the post. "Moreover, we will invite third party reviewers to examine the system that is running to confirm that the open source code is what is running. Trust through total transparency is the only thing that should be believed," he added.The controversy erupted over the weekend when a security researcher discovered that xAI's tool was harvesting vastly more information than was actually required to answer standard coding requests. In one extreme test, as per a report by Axios, Grok Build uploaded a massive 5.1GB of data for a task that only needed 192KB, essentially collecting up to roughly 26,000 times more data than necessary.Security experts warn that this excessive data grab likely scooped up proprietary source code, private database passwords, API keys and cloud credentials. The breach quickly caught the attention of OpenAI's Sam Altman, who posted a blunt, one-word response on X calling the situation: "Concerning". In a separate post, Altman added that the incident was "a reason to favor open-source harnesses".Shortly after the security researcher published the findings, the uploads stopped without users needing to download a software patch, indicating that xAI had quickly shut down the system from its end.xAI released an official statement on Monday claiming that "no trace and code data is ever retained" for enterprise customers who hold strict zero-data-retention agreements.Furthermore, Musk announced a total purge of the collected information to pacify outraged developers. "As a precautionary measure, all user data that was uploaded to SpaceXAI before now will be completely and utterly deleted. Zero anything whatsoever will remain," Musk stated.
Elon Musk Reverses Course and Calls Anthropic the AI Leader - Memeburn
For South African businesses, the deal shows how access to AI tools increasingly depends on a small group of foreign infrastructure providers. Elon Musk has made a sharp U-turn on Anthropic. After months of attacking the Claude developer as "woke," hypocritical and unlikely to win the AI race, Musk now says Anthropic has become the industry's clear leader. He also praised its newest models and promised that he wouldn't use his control over computing infrastructure to seriously harm the company. The warmer language matters because Anthropic isn't just one of Musk's competitors anymore. It's also a major customer. Musk admits he got Anthropic wrong Musk acknowledged the reversal in a post on X, writing that he was "clearly wrong about Anthropic." "They are obviously currently the leader in AI," he added, while praising Anthropic's Mythos and Fable models. The comments represent a dramatic change from his earlier public attacks on the company, as detailed in Business Insider's report on Musk's Anthropic reversal. Earlier in 2026, Musk accused Anthropic of stealing training data, promoting political bias and acting hypocritically. He also dismissed the company's chances of beating rivals such as OpenAI, Google and his own AI operation. Now, he's describing the company's technology as the best available. That doesn't mean the rivalry has disappeared. Musk continues to promote Grok as a serious challenger, especially after the release of Grok 4.5. You can read our breakdown of Elon Musk's Grok 4.5 "Opus-class" claims for a closer look at how his model compares with Anthropic's systems. The compute deal changed the relationship The friendlier tone emerged after Anthropic signed a major computing agreement with SpaceX. According to Anthropic's official announcement of the SpaceX compute partnership, the company gained access to more than 300 megawatts of capacity, representing over 220,000 Nvidia GPUs at the Colossus 1 data centre. Anthropic said the added infrastructure would increase usage limits for Claude subscribers and API customers. Reported contract documents indicate that Anthropic agreed to pay around $1.25 billion per month for capacity through May 2029. However, termination clauses may allow either party to leave the agreement with relatively short notice. That creates an unusual relationship. Musk responded to suggestions that he could simply cut Anthropic off. He said he wouldn't end access in a way that seriously damaged the company, even though Claude competes with Grok. Praise doesn't remove the business risk Musk's assurance may calm some concerns, but Anthropic still faces a clear dependency. A frontier AI company needs more than clever researchers and strong software. It needs enormous data centres, reliable electricity, advanced chips and enough cooling equipment to run those chips around the clock. Only a small number of companies can provide that infrastructure at the required scale. We think the real story here isn't Musk's change of heart. It's the growing power held by companies that control computing capacity. Musk can compete against Anthropic through Grok while earning billions from Anthropic's demand for GPUs. In other words, he can benefit whether customers choose his AI model or one built by a rival. That helps explain why public criticism may now matter less than commercial cooperation. What it means for South African AI users For South African companies, the dispute may feel distant. But the infrastructure behind Claude, Grok and other major models directly affects local pricing, reliability and availability. A startup in Cape Town or Johannesburg might build its customer service, coding or research workflow around Claude. Yet the servers powering that service sit overseas and may depend on commercial agreements between a handful of American technology companies. If those agreements change, local customers have limited influence. This matters because African businesses often access AI as imported infrastructure, rather than technology they control themselves. The Anthropic-SpaceX relationship offers another reminder that model access can depend on corporate negotiations taking place thousands of kilometres away. It also strengthens the argument for more African investment in data centres, energy capacity and locally hosted AI systems. South Africa has a growing cloud and data-centre sector, but training a frontier model still requires infrastructure on a completely different scale. Musk's endorsement could shift again Musk's latest position combines praise with competition. He has acknowledged Anthropic's technical lead while continuing to argue that his younger AI business could catch up. The recent release of Grok 4.5 shows that Musk hasn't abandoned the race; he's simply recognising the strongest current opponent. What we're watching now is whether the cooperation survives the next major model launch. Anthropic needs stable computing capacity. Musk wants Grok to win. Those goals can coexist while the infrastructure deal remains profitable, but a closer contest could test that arrangement. So, is Musk genuinely reconsidering Anthropic, or has a billion-dollar customer simply become harder to criticise? FAQs Why did Elon Musk change his opinion about Anthropic? Musk admitted that he had misjudged Anthropic's progress and now considers it a leader in artificial intelligence. The company's newer Claude models have performed strongly in coding, reasoning and business tasks. Anthropic's commercial relationship with Musk-controlled infrastructure may also have softened the rivalry. Does Anthropic compete with Elon Musk's xAI? Yes, Anthropic and xAI are direct competitors in the advanced AI model market. Anthropic develops Claude, while xAI offers Grok across X and other Musk-owned platforms. However, the companies can still cooperate on computing infrastructure while competing for users. Why does Anthropic need so much computing power? Training and operating advanced AI models requires thousands of powerful chips, large data centres and substantial electricity. More computing capacity allows Anthropic to improve Claude and support more users without severe usage limits. It also helps the company compete with OpenAI, Google and xAI.
Cerebras CEO Andrew Feldman Says Elon Musk Found a 'Pretty Good Idea' in Leasing SpaceXAI's Unused Grok Capacity to Anthropic
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Cerebras Systems Inc. CEO Andrew Feldman says SpaceXAI, formerly xAI, moved into rented AI computing because its processors were not busy enough, as Grok drew less usage than expected. Feldman Blames Grok's Weak Early Adoption Speaking with Molly O'Shea on the Sourcery podcast on Monday, Feldman explained that Musk's company pivoted to an operator that rents out AI infrastructure because its Grok model struggled with early enterprise market adoption, leaving billions of dollars in hardware sitting idle. "You have to ask why they had available capacity," Feldman said. "They had available capacity because the Grok model wasn't used very much." Cerebras CEO @andrewdfeldman explains why @elonmusk and SpaceXAI made a deal to lease GPUs to Anthropic: "You have to ask why they had available capacity... They had available capacity because the Grok model wasn't used very much." "They had these GPUs sitting around, and... https://t.co/1IHsE98NR3 pic.twitter.com/ssomhhLJJl -- sourcery (@sourceryy) July 13, 2026 Trending: Avoid the #1 Investing Mistake: How Your 'Safe' Holdings Could Be Costing You Big Time Feldman said SpaceXAI could not afford to leave equipment idle. "They had these GPUs sitting around, and that's a bad idea," he said. He pointed to IPO-bound Anthropic's agreement to use SpaceX's Colossus 1 data center in Memphis, Tennessee. Anthropic said the site provides more than 300 megawatts through over 220,000 Nvidia GPUs, allowing it to double Claude Code limits, remove peak-hour reductions and raise API ceilings. "They leased a whole block of them to Anthropic, and looked up and said, 'Whoa, that's a pretty good idea,'" Feldman said. "We had all these GPUs. Our model wasn't a success, but we can have a great business by stepping into what is a constrained market." Anthropic Deal Monetizes Idle GPU Capacity In May, Anthropic agreed to pay $1.25 billion per month for Colossus and Colossus II capacity through May 2029. Both sides can terminate with 90 days' notice, and Musk described the arrangement as a six-month lease, leaving its long-term value uncertain. See Also: Skip the Regrets: The Essential Retirement Tips Experts Wish Everyone Knew Earlier. Colossus 1 supported Grok's development, but Reuters described its capacity as unused prior to the Anthropic agreement. SpaceXAI said Grok 4.5 trained across tens of thousands of Nvidia GB300 processors.
SpaceX is the Dutch East India Company of the space age
In August 1602, more than 1 100 investors - from wealthy merchants to ordinary craftsmen - subscribed to the world's first initial public offering. The Dutch East India Company, the VOC, raised Gld6.4-million to build a maritime trade network stretching from Amsterdam to the East Indies. On 12 June 2026, SpaceX raised US$75-billion in the largest IPO in Wall Street history, pricing at $135/share and closing its first session more than 19% higher. Demand was roughly double the shares on offer - and South Africans were not left out, pouring R179-million into the stock through EasyEquities in just two days. Separated by 424 years, the parallel is worth taking seriously. Neither company was first into its frontier - Portuguese fleets reached the East Indies long before the Dutch, and governments have been launching rockets since the 1950s. What both did first was ask the public capital markets to fund a frontier, at a scale and time horizon no private syndicate would stomach. The VOC's real innovations were financial. As economic historian Gerard Koot notes in his history of the company, it introduced limited liability for shareholders and, unlike earlier ventures wound up after a single voyage, locked in its capital for a decade - a permanent fund for voyages that took years to pay off. Tradeable shares made the risk bearable, and gave the world the Amsterdam Stock Exchange as a by-product. SpaceX's logic is strikingly similar. The capital-hungry Starship programme - the company wants to be flying a rocket every 53 minutes within five years - and the Starlink constellation that is rewriting the economics of global connectivity consume cash on a scale that outgrew even Silicon Valley's deepest private pockets. As in 1602, the public market was the only pool of capital big enough. State-like influence The VOC's monopoly came stamped with sovereign powers: the right to make treaties with Asian governments, enlist soldiers, wage war, and build and administer forts - a company that behaved like a state. SpaceX holds no royal charter, yet its position is not far off a monopoly in practice. In 2025 it accounted for roughly half of all orbital launches worldwide and, by mass delivered to orbit, more than 80% of global upmass. It is also the de facto ferryman for Nasa astronauts: when a bungled test flight of Boeing's Starliner left two astronauts stuck on the International Space Station for 286 days, it was a SpaceX capsule that brought them home last year. Read: China nets a falling rocket in reusability race with SpaceX More telling still is Starlink's geopolitical weight. The constellation became crucial to Ukraine's communications infrastructure within days of Russia's invasion, and decisions about its coverage have shaped battlefield outcomes - leading Foreign Policy to argue that Starlink has effectively privatised a slice of geopolitics. Buyers of SPCX are not simply buying a technology company; they are buying into an entity with sovereign-level leverage over who connects, where and on what terms. The VOC was never just a shipping line: it ran an inter-Asian trading system from Persia to Japan, dealt in spices, textiles, porcelain and silver, and administered territory - a diversified enterprise built on control of a frontier's logistics. SpaceX, likewise, is no longer just a rocket company. In February 2026, it executed the largest M&A deal on record: an all-stock acquisition of Elon Musk's xAI valued at $250-billion, folding the X social platform and Grok AI models into the listed entity in service of Musk's ambition to build orbital data centres. The result is a company betting the rocket farm on AI: a space, connectivity and AI conglomerate whose parts reinforce one another the way the VOC's ships, ports and monopolies once did. The VOC is one of the few frontier enterprises with a share price record spanning two centuries - and its first lesson is patience. Shareholders waited more than seven years for a dividend, and the first, in 1610, was paid in mace - the spice, not money. Frontier infrastructure pays out slowly. There is no SpaceX moonbase yet, let alone Mars colonies. The second is that the frontier premium was real, but earned over decades. Economist and historian Lodewijk Petram, who reconstructed the price record from 17th-century merchants' papers, calculates an average annual return of 8.69% between 1603 and 1697 - comfortably above the 4-6% paid on Dutch government bonds. The third is that the premium decays as the frontier matures. After 1650, returns settled at a bond-like 3.5-4% a year. As economic historians Jan de Vries and Ad van der Woude concluded: "The profits earned by the Company's actual equity were modest after the 1650s, and vanishingly small after 1730." The fourth is that price and reality can part ways entirely. The VOC's share price hit its all-time high in 1720 - not because of anything happening in Batavia, but because a speculative frenzy had spread from London across the continent. By then the company's underlying returns were already bond-like. (And the viral claim that the VOC was once worth $8-trillion in today's money is, as Petram has shown, off by a factor of roughly 8 000. SpaceX, at over $2-trillion, is already far larger in real terms than the VOC ever was - the comparison is about the category of enterprise, not its size.) Where the analogy strains The last lesson is the bleakest: dominance is not a perpetuity. From 1730, the VOC paid dividends it had not earned, funding them by drawing down its capital. War with Britain finished the job, the state nationalised the wreck in 1795 and the charter lapsed on 31 December 1799. There are caveats. The VOC's monopoly was granted by the state and enforced by cannon - its most profitable decades followed ruthless violence in the Banda Islands - while SpaceX's dominance is commercial and contestable. Rivals are massing: Europe's Iris2 constellation and Amazon Leo, which is heading for South Africa before Starlink is even licensed here. And as TechCentral has noted, the biggest IPO ever is also one of the riskiest, given its dependence on one man and on programmes whose economics remain unproven. None of this is a prediction about the share price. What the comparison establishes is the category of thing investors have just been offered: not a stake in a product company but a stake in the infrastructure of a frontier, with all the reach, entanglement and political gravity that implies. The VOC's record suggests such an investment can beat the market for decades - and that the premium fades once the frontier is tamed, and that the price, at the moment of greatest euphoria, can be the least reliable guide to what lies beneath. Space is the "final frontier", after all: no one knows how it will play out. Going boldly where no company has gone before carries immense potential reward - and equally immense risk. - © 2026 NewsCentral Media
SpaceX reportedly shows prototype of smartphone to investors as IPO looms
Elon Musk denied the Wall Street Journal report, calling it 'utterly false,' but the implications for telecom and tech markets are hard to ignore The Wall Street Journal reported on July 1, 2026, that SpaceX showed a prototype of a slim, AI-driven device to select investors. The device was described as thinner than an iPhone, powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset, and deeply integrated with xAI technology. Elon Musk immediately denied it, taking to X to call the report "utterly false." What we know about the device According to the WSJ report, the prototype was presented to institutional investors and stakeholders as part of SpaceX's capital-raising efforts ahead of its anticipated IPO. The company has been preparing to go public, with its offering projected for June 2026. Musk denied SpaceX was developing a phone as recently as February 2026. That's barely four months before the company allegedly showed one to investors. The Starlink connection SpaceX's Starlink Direct to Cell initiative has been forging partnerships with telecommunications firms, positioning satellite-based mobile service as a complement to traditional cell towers. One of the most notable moves in this space has been a spectrum deal with EchoStar valued at $1 billion. Why crypto markets should pay attention There's no evidence linking this prototype to any cryptocurrency or blockchain technology. No wallet integration, no token, no decentralized anything. The research is clear on this point. The SpaceX IPO itself is a gravitational event for capital allocation. When one of the most anticipated public offerings in history hits the market, it pulls institutional money from other asset classes. Crypto has historically felt the effects of major tech IPOs as portfolio managers rebalance. Starlink reaching underserved populations with a low-cost, AI-powered device could expand the addressable market for mobile-first crypto products in regions where traditional telecom infrastructure has lagged.
Needham raises SpaceX stock price target to $250 on AI, Starship By Investing.com
Investing.com - Needham raised its price target on SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX) to $250 from $200 while maintaining a Buy rating on Tuesday. The upgrade comes as shares trade at $136, near their 52-week low of $135.52, following an 8.2% decline over the past week. According to InvestingPro analysis, the stock appears undervalued at current levels, potentially offering investors an attractive entry point. The firm cited the company's release of Grok 4.5 on July 8, SpaceX's first AI model built for coding and agentic work. The model was trained on Cursor developer data and has received strong reviews on third-party AI benchmarks. Needham noted the model does not quite match leading models from Anthropic or OpenAI but puts SpaceXAI back on track after Elon Musk said in March the company had to completely rebuild its AI program. SpaceX announced its Starship flight 13 is scheduled to launch as early as July 16. The flight will deliver 20 full-size Starlink V3 test units to orbit and advance Ship and Booster re-usability. Needham said AI model performance and Starship success to orbit are key unlocks for the company's total addressable market. The firm raised its price target on increased confidence in execution. InvestingPro data reveals analysts predict the company will turn profitable this year, with 13 additional ProTips available to subscribers. In other recent news, flyExclusive, Inc. has completed its acquisition of aviation assets from Jet.AI. This transaction includes Jet.AI's Jet Card members, two HondaJets, one Citation CJ4, and three future Citation CJ3 delivery positions valued at approximately $4.1 million. Additionally, flyExclusive gained approximately $6.1 million in securities through indirect ownership of Space Exploration Technologies Corp. shares and about $5.3 million in cash. Meanwhile, SpaceX has received significant attention from analysts. Evercore ISI initiated coverage on SpaceX with an "outperform" rating and set a price target of $230. Stifel reiterated a "Buy" rating with a $190 price target, highlighting the upcoming Starship Flight 13 launch. Raymond James also reiterated a "Strong Buy" rating with an $800 price target, noting a significant reduction in the time between recent Starship flights. Deutsche Bank released an analysis suggesting that SpaceX could achieve cost parity between orbital and terrestrial data centers by the early 2030s. This article was generated with the support of AI and reviewed by an editor. For more information see our T&C.
xAI's Colossus 2 Power Plant Operated Without Federal Air Permits
Fifty-Nine Turbines, No Federal Permits Elon Musk's xAI installed 59 natural gas turbines to power its Colossus 2 data center without securing federal clean air permits, according to correspondence between regulators and company representatives. That number is roughly double what the company has publicly acknowledged. At least 57 of the turbines run in Southaven, Mississippi, minutes across the state line from the Memphis facility they feed. Their potential emissions land far above the threshold that triggers a federal permit requirement, in communities already carrying high rates of lung disease. Key Takeaways * Manufacturer emissions profiles for just 30 of the 59 turbines indicate they could release nearly 2,500 short tons of nitrogen oxide, 4,000 short tons of carbon monoxide, and 22 short tons of formaldehyde annually at 80 percent capacity, against a Clean Air Act permitting threshold of 100 short tons. * Within five miles of the Mississippi site, roughly 46 percent of DeSoto County residents are Black against 33 percent countywide; across the Tennessee line, about 94 percent are Black against 52 percent in Shelby County. * The Justice Department filed on June 15 arguing that restricting the turbines could threaten national security because xAI's systems support US military operations, including operations involving Iran. The company said in January it was running 27 unpermitted turbines for Colossus 2 and has argued throughout that no permits are needed. The records tell a different count. Those records came from a public records request and include emails between Trinity Consultants, representing xAI and subsidiary MZX Tech, and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality. They show 57 off-grid turbines installed in Southaven and two more at an unidentified site. xAI did not respond to a request for comment. How Big This Is Ben King, an analyst at the think tank Rhodium Group, reviewed the emissions analysis. "This looks to be an unprecedented level of behind-the-meter gas being installed in one place," he said, using the term for off-grid gas plants serving a single customer. Nicholas Mailloux, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who studies air quality, said the nitrogen oxide figure for roughly half the plant would put the facility "up there with some of the heaviest polluting natural gas power plants across the entire country." He said it would rank on par with the top 25 US gas plants for nitrogen oxide, citing EPA data on actual emissions. Nitrogen oxides feed smog and inflame airways. Carbon monoxide starves the body of oxygen. Formaldehyde causes cancer. The Mobile Turbine Argument Mississippi regulators issued a permit in March for 41 permanent gas-fired turbines at the site, three weeks after the state's only public hearing on the project. The 59 now running are separate and unpermitted. xAI and state regulators argue in court filings that the turbines are exempt because they are mobile and meant to operate on site for less than a year. "MDEQ has determined that portable/temporary turbines do not require an air permit," the agency told reporters. The Environmental Protection Agency said in January 2026 that temporary turbines exceeding emissions thresholds must be permitted. The agency now says it is weighing "regulatory flexibilities" for portable units while protecting public health. A Clean Air Act permit would have exposed the project to years of review and public comment. The Lawsuit The NAACP and the Southern Environmental Law Center, represented by Earthjustice, sued xAI in April to stop the turbines, arguing the emissions fall under the Clean Air Act and are polluting homes, schools, and churches. "The scale of it is astonishing," said Patrick Anderson, an attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center. "This is an absolutely huge Clean Air Act violation that threatens public health." "This sets up scenarios where the government can create sacrifice zones and tell communities they have to breathe illegal air pollution," said Mary Rock, a senior attorney for Earthjustice. The complaint filed on behalf of the national NAACP and its Mississippi State Conference asks the court to halt the unpermitted units, order best available control technology, and assess penalties for every day of violation. An earlier round of legal pressure worked: after a notice of intent to sue over the original Colossus site, xAI pulled its unpermitted turbines there and permitted the remainder. Advocates noted at the time that the Southaven build repeated the same sequence a few miles south, with no public input and no notice to neighbors. xAI, now owned by SpaceX, has not detailed how a planned third Memphis-area data center would be powered. The People Living With It In Colonial Hills, a Southaven neighborhood, the turbines run around the clock and fire off bursts residents compare to jet engines. Ervin Laws, a resident in his 20s, said the noise wakes him at night. "I can't do anything about it, because he's got more money than me," he said, referring to Musk. The health baseline was already poor. In 27 of 28 census tracts within five miles of the site, spanning both states, estimated asthma rates exceeded countywide figures. In 24 tracts, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease rates did too. Five miles is a standard radius in environmental health research for capturing populations exposed to a stationary source. Shelby County and parts of DeSoto County have previously failed federal ozone standards and remain under EPA-approved plans to keep them from slipping back. Nitrogen oxide is a key ingredient in ozone formation. "Given this community struggles with high asthma rates, additional NOx exposure at such high rates could exacerbate public health issues in a community that is already seeing more than its fair share of exposure to toxic air pollution," said Victoria Nelson, an independent environmental engineer formerly at EPA. "This is a massive amount of turbines and an unfathomable amount of air pollution," Southaven resident Shannon Samsa said. "It's not a hypothetical," she added, "that air pollution is bad for you." Jayajit Chakraborty, a professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, said the demographic analysis matches research showing communities of color face higher exposure to fossil fuel pollution. A 2022 study by UCLA and Columbia researchers published in Nature Energy found that previously redlined neighborhoods now face disproportionately high exposure to pollutants from fossil fuel facilities. "Air pollution from these and other sources contributes to systemic racial disparities in chronic disease and ultimately shorter lives," Lara Cushing, a UCLA public health professor who co-authored the study, said. Sarah Gladney, 72, has watched xAI expand from her home in Boxtown, a historically Black Memphis neighborhood near the original Colossus site built in 2024. "Once they got their foot in the door in Memphis, I feel like it's going to be a continuous movement of xAI into these other communities," she said. "It's all about the money, and it's not about the health or wellness of the people that live in or near these communities." Why This Case Matters Beyond Memphis The turbines are one node in a national buildout. Scores of off-grid power plants for data centers are proposed or under construction across the country, and local authorities routinely approve them in weeks rather than the years of study grid-connected plants face. xAI's cluster is already among the largest of them. Noise has been its own front. Residents living near the Southaven plant spent months documenting the sound before the company built a barrier, and neighbors nicknamed the $7 million wall the "Temu sound wall" after it failed to help. That episode also surfaced how thin the paper trail is: records requests to the city about noise ordinance exemptions came back empty. The same pattern of fast approvals and thin oversight is why communities across the country have started blocking data center projects outright. The commercial stakes explain the hurry. Colossus and Colossus 2 together supply roughly one gigawatt of compute, and analysts now argue that SpaceX's near-term AI value rests on those ground facilities rather than orbital plans, with compute contracts projected above $28 billion a year. The Memphis clusters also run Musk's Macrohard project, an agent system built to imitate entire software companies. Every quarter of delay costs money, and permits take years. xAI, the MDEQ, and the EPA did not answer questions about pollution impacts on communities of color. The court will decide how environmental law applies to an industry building faster than the rules were written for.
xAI Ran 59 Unpermitted Gas Turbines in Black Communities, DOJ Now Shields Them
DOJ's national-security defense would let any White House override Clean Air Act citizen suits Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI operated 59 natural gas turbines without a single required federal clean-air permit to power its Colossus 2 supercomputing campus on the Tennessee-Mississippi border -- nearly double the 27 turbines the company had publicly acknowledged -- according to regulatory communications reviewed by Reuters and published July 14. The turbines' potential annual emissions run roughly 25 times the federal threshold that triggers mandatory permitting, and the pollution falls on predominantly Black neighborhoods that federal data already show face cancer risk approximately four times the national average. What happens next in the Northern District of Mississippi could determine whether any community near any polluting facility in America retains the legal right to enforce the Clean Air Act when regulators refuse to act -- because the U.S. Department of Justice is not just defending xAI's turbines. It is arguing in federal court that the Executive Branch can permanently terminate congressionally-authorized citizen suits under the Clean Air Act whenever a project is deemed a political priority, according to the DOJ's June 15 motion to intervene and dismiss. Regulators Counted Twice What xAI Admitted Running The disclosure comes from a public-records request that surfaced regulatory emails to MDEQ between Trinity Consultants, acting on behalf of xAI and its energy-infrastructure subsidiary MZX Tech, and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality. At least 57 of the 59 turbines are located in Southaven, Mississippi -- just across the state line from the Colossus 2 data center in Memphis, Tennessee -- with two additional units at an unidentified second site. xAI had stated in January 2026 that it was running 27 unpermitted turbines at Southaven and has maintained throughout the dispute that no permits were required. Reuters' analysis of manufacturer emissions profiles for 32 of the 59 turbines found that 30 units at Southaven alone could emit close to 2,500 short tons of nitrogen oxides annually, along with 4,000 short tons of carbon monoxide and 22 short tons of formaldehyde, assuming continuous operation at 80 percent of capacity -- the load level the EPA identifies as typical for efficiency, according to the Reuters emissions analysis. The Clean Air Act requires federal permits for any facility capable of emitting more than 100 short tons of nitrogen oxides per year, according to the EPA permitting threshold under 40 CFR. Nicholas Mailloux, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, told Reuters that a facility emitting at that rate would rank among the 25 highest nitrogen oxide emitters of any gas plant in the United States, measured against the EPA's actual-emissions database, in the University of Wisconsin analysis. By May 2026, the 495-megawatt cluster was generating electricity equal to the output of a conventional utility power plant -- for a single private customer. Ben King, an analyst with the Rhodium Group who reviewed the Reuters analysis, called it "an unprecedented level of behind-the-meter gas being installed in one place," in Ben King's analysis. How "Portable" Turbines Became a Half-Gigawatt Power Plant With No Permit The permit dispute turns on a technical classification. xAI and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality have argued throughout that the Solar Turbines SMT-130 trailer-mounted units at Southaven are "portable" or "temporary" equipment that qualifies for an exemption from federal permitting requirements -- because the turbines are mounted on flatbed trailers and nominally capable of being moved, they have been classified as mobile sources rather than stationary sources under MDEQ's permit determination. The technical reality is different. Gas turbines of this class -- packaged industrial combustion units -- produce electricity through the continuous combustion of natural gas. That combustion produces nitrogen oxides through a high-temperature reaction between atmospheric nitrogen and oxygen; without best pollution controls such as selective catalytic reduction technology, which can cut NOx output by 90 percent, the turbines emit at full rates. The 59 turbines at the Southaven site have been running continuously as primary power sources -- not backup generators -- for the Colossus 2 data center since at least October 2025, a duration that EPA's January 2026 ruling said exceeds the permanence threshold that defines a stationary source regardless of trailer mounting. The U.S. EPA took that position explicitly: temporary turbines exceeding federal emissions thresholds must obtain permits, regardless of their mobility, per EPA's permit requirement. The agency is now, separately, considering changes that would create "regulatory flexibilities" for portable units -- a reconsideration that environmental groups describe as a quiet rollback tailored to the AI industry, according to EPA's regulatory flexibility review. A Pattern Replicated From Colossus 1 This is not xAI's first time running unpermitted turbines in the Memphis area. The company's original Colossus facility in South Memphis followed the same sequence: aerial imagery from April 2025 showed more than 30 unpermitted turbines operating at the site, and the company eventually obtained a Shelby County Health Department permit for only 15 of them in July 2025, after SELC threatened a citizen suit, per SELC's Colossus 1 account. The Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, in a letter to EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin launched by Ranking Member Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse on April 15, 2026, documented that xAI's senior manager Brent Mayo had explicitly described the approach to Colossus 2 as "copy and past[e] what [it] did at the Colossus 1 site," per Whitehouse's EPW investigation. Rather than respond to the February notice of intent to sue from the NAACP, SELC, and Earthjustice on February 13, 2026, xAI added turbines -- growing the count from 27 at the time of the notice to 33 by the time the lawsuit was filed in April, to 46 as of May, and now to 59 as documented by Reuters. Whitehouse and Sens. Martin Heinrich and Chris Van Hollen had separately launched a broader probe of eight AI companies on March 13, 2026, covering gas-powered data center plans at Meta, OpenAI, xAI, and five others, also per the Senate probe of AI companies. Who Is Breathing the Emissions Both of xAI's Memphis-area turbine sites sit adjacent to predominantly Black neighborhoods that already carry disproportionate pollution burdens. Within five miles of the Southaven turbines on the Tennessee side of the state line, approximately 94 percent of residents are Black -- compared with 52 percent of Shelby County's overall population; on the Mississippi side, about 46 percent of residents within that radius are Black, compared with 33 percent countywide, according to the Reuters demographic analysis. In 27 of 28 census tracts within five miles of the site, estimated asthma rates exceed their respective countywide figures; in 24 of 28, rates of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease also run above countywide levels, per Reuters CDC health data. Shelby County, Tennessee and DeSoto County, Mississippi both received an "F" for ozone pollution from the American Lung Association ratings, and Memphis was separately named an "asthma capital" by that organization. A 2022 study by researchers at UCLA and Columbia University, published in Nature Energy, found that neighborhoods historically subject to redlining continue to experience higher exposure to pollutants from fossil-fuel facilities. In the Colonial Hills neighborhood of Southaven, where the turbines can be heard around the clock, Ervin Laws said the noise wakes him at night. Laws told Reuters: "I can't do anything about it, because he's got more money than me," referring to Musk. Sarah Gladney, 72, watching from her home in Boxtown -- the historically Black Memphis neighborhood a few miles from Colossus 1 -- Gladney told Reuters she sees a pattern: "Once they got their foot in the door in Memphis, I feel like it's going to be a continuous movement of xAI into these other communities. It's all about the money, and it's not about the health or wellness of the people that live in or near these communities." On April 14, 2026, the NAACP -- represented by Earthjustice and the Southern Environmental Law Center -- filed a Clean Air Act lawsuit against xAI and MZX Tech in the Northern District of Mississippi, seeking an order to halt turbine operations, installation of Best Available Control Technology, and civil penalties of approximately $124,000 per day for each violation of federal law, per NAACP's April 2026 complaint. Residents in Colonial Hills filed a separate lawsuit over turbine noise. Anderson told Reuters: "The scale of it is astonishing," said Patrick Anderson, a senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center. DOJ's Intervention: The Iran Operations Claim, and What It Could Mean for All Citizen Suits The legal fight took an extraordinary turn when the Department of Justice, on June 15, 2026, filed a motion to intervene and dismiss the NAACP's Clean Air Act lawsuit outright -- not as a third party offering perspective, but as a plaintiff moving to terminate the case, according to DOJ's June 15 filing. Notably, DOJ's 33-page filing did not dispute the NAACP's core allegation that xAI is operating without required Clean Air Act permits. The filing rests on two distinct arguments. The first is national security: Cameron Stanley, the Department of Defense's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Officer, submitted a declaration stating that Grok is one of only four proprietary AI models currently capable of supporting national security applications, and that during what he identified as Operation Epic Fury, the Grok model enabled U.S. forces to deploy over 2,000 munitions to 2,000 distinct targets within 96 hours -- making the Colossus 2 power supply, in the DOJ's framing, a matter of paramount national security, per Stanley's Pentagon declaration. The second argument is structural and goes further. The DOJ contends that under Article II of the Constitution, the Executive Branch holds exclusive authority over enforcement discretion under the Clean Air Act, and that this authority extends to terminating citizen suits whenever they conflict with "federal policy, national security, and the public interest," per DOJ's Article II argument. Harvard Law School senior staff attorney Erika Kranz noted in Kranz's Harvard analysis that this marks "the first time" the United States has intervened in a citizen suit against a private defendant specifically seeking dismissal. David M. Uhlmann, who served as Assistant Administrator for EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance, warned in Uhlmann's EPN statement that DOJ was "trying to rewrite the Clean Air Act and turn the public's right to bring citizen suits into a permission slip the Executive Branch can revoke." Michael Gerrard, an environmental law professor at Columbia Law School, Gerrard told CNN the intervention was "highly unusual," adding that the future legal ramifications "could be much broader than this case, effectively taking away an important route for people to fight against pollution in their neighborhoods." Gerrard further noted: if AI data centers can power themselves through mobile turbines without permits, "that's going to be replicated in many other places, and these mobile turbines are horribly polluting and will have a very negative health effect." For 50 years, Clean Air Act citizen suits -- used in thousands of cases and responsible for billions in fines and settlements -- have been the primary backstop when EPA and state regulators decline to act, the EPN's June 2026 warning noted. The DOJ's theory, if accepted by the court, would give any administration the power to shut down that backstop whenever a favored project is in the crosshairs. Grok's actual competitive standing provides context for the weight of Stanley's national security claims. As of mid-2026, the model ranks ninth on a major multi-domain AI leaderboard and last in coding among the models tracked there -- well behind the leading systems from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic. Tennessee State Rep. Justin J. Pearson, a Democrat who lives a few miles from the data center, called the DOJ intervention "unconscionable," with Pearson telling CNN: "The DOJ seeks to remove any recourse Americans have to protect themselves from harm." How AI Infrastructure's Energy Strategy Compares Across the Industry xAI's approach sits at the extreme end of a spectrum of strategies that AI companies have used to address their surging power demands. Microsoft signed a deal to restart a retired nuclear unit at Three Mile Island; Google has made substantial investments in next-generation geothermal energy; Amazon has pursued large-scale renewable energy contracts. xAI's strategy -- deploying trailer-mounted gas turbines and litigating the permitting question afterward -- represents the most aggressive approach in the industry in terms of speed and regulatory risk. SpaceX's S-1 disclosure, which now covers xAI as a combined entity, disclosed plans to purchase an additional $2.8 billion worth of gas turbines over the next three years, with at least $2 billion earmarked for "mobile" units -- the exact category at the center of the litigation. Mississippi has approved plans for a third xAI data center, Colossus 3, in Southaven, per Colossus 3 approvals, which would bring xAI's total Memphis-area power demand to nearly 2 gigawatts -- roughly the equivalent of two large utility power plants running simultaneously. Roughly one-third of all planned new U.S. data center power capacity is now designed to bypass the shared grid through on-site gas generation -- a pattern the Senate probe characterized in April 2026 as an emerging industry trend, not a corporate anomaly, per the TechTimes grid emergency report. The DOE has used a 1935 wartime law three times in 2026 to manage grid emergencies driven directly by AI data center demand growth, per TechTimes grid emergency analysis. What Comes Next for the Communities and the Law The NAACP lawsuit is proceeding in the Northern District of Mississippi with the DOJ's dismissal motion pending judicial review. The EPA's reconsideration of its January 2026 position on portable turbines is ongoing, and its outcome could reshape permitting requirements for behind-the-meter gas generation at AI data centers nationwide. For the communities near the turbines, the legal complexity competes with immediate physical reality. In 27 of the 28 census tracts within five miles of the Southaven site, asthma rates already run above countywide levels -- before any formal emissions measurements from the 59-turbine array have been completed, per Reuters health data. If the court accepts the DOJ's argument, those communities would lose the citizen-suit enforcement tool that has been their primary legal recourse in environmental disputes for half a century -- leaving them with no practical remedy even if regulators continue to decline action, even if xAI adds more turbines, and even if Colossus 3 follows the same permitting-optional playbook its predecessors did. Frequently Asked Questions Why does DOJ's intervention matter beyond xAI's turbines specifically? The DOJ is not simply defending xAI on the facts of this case. It is advancing a constitutional argument -- rooted in Article II of the Constitution -- that the Executive Branch holds exclusive authority to terminate congressionally-authorized citizen suits under the Clean Air Act whenever those suits conflict with federal policy, national security, or the public interest. If the federal court in Mississippi accepts this theory, it would give any presidential administration veto power over citizen enforcement actions against any polluter whose project the government deems a priority -- not just AI companies, not just this administration. Legal scholars including a former EPA enforcement chief and environmental law professors at Columbia and Harvard have described this as the most consequential threat to citizen-suit environmental enforcement in the law's 50-year history. Are there 59 turbines now, or is that a historical count? As of Reuters' July 14, 2026 disclosure -- which is the most current reporting available -- 59 unpermitted turbines have been documented at xAI's Southaven operation through regulatory correspondence, including manufacturer emissions profiles for 32 of them. At least 57 are confirmed at the Southaven address (2875 Stanton Road South) and two additional units are at an unidentified second site. The NAACP's preliminary injunction request from May 2026 cited 33 turbines; subsequent WIRED and ESG Dive reporting placed the count at 46 as of mid-May. Reuters' figure of 59 represents the most current and most thoroughly sourced count available. Who has the legal right to challenge this in court if Clean Air Act citizen suits are struck down? Under the current legal framework, Clean Air Act citizen suits are the primary recourse when the EPA and state environmental agencies decline to take enforcement action. If DOJ's argument succeeds, that backstop disappears: only the federal government could pursue enforcement, and only when it chooses to do so. Communities near polluting facilities -- whether AI data centers, refineries, power plants, or industrial operations -- would have no independent legal standing to force compliance. This is the precedent Columbia Law Professor Michael Gerrard and Harvard Law's Erika Kranz identified as the case's truly broad consequence, extending far beyond the specific turbines in Mississippi. What can residents near AI data centers do right now? For residents near existing or planned AI data centers with gas-fired power sources: monitor local air quality through EPA's AirNow platform and community sensor networks such as PurpleAir; contact your state environmental agency to ask whether any behind-the-meter gas generation at nearby data centers holds a valid air permit; contact your congressional representatives about the Senate probe of AI company energy practices and EPA's pending decision on portable turbine "regulatory flexibilities"; and follow NAACP v. xAI (Case 3:26-cv-00074, Northern District of Mississippi) for the court's decision on both the injunction and the DOJ's dismissal motion, which will set the precedent applicable to future cases nationwide.
One Month in and SpaceX Stock Is Down More Than 35% from Its Post-IPO Peak. How to Play SPCX Here.
A month ago, SpaceX Corporation (SPCX) arrived on the public markets with the kind of excitement few companies have ever generated. Investors rushed in, betting not just on rockets and satellites, but on Elon Musk's vision of building the next great technology powerhouse. The stock wasted no time rewarding that optimism, soaring well above its IPO price within days and briefly cementing itself among the world's most valuable companies. But Wall Street has a habit of sobering up after the celebration. More News from Barchart Since peaking just days after its blockbuster debut, SpaceX stock has tumbled 38.5%, giving back much of its early gains. The pullback came despite a steady stream of headline-grabbing announcements, including a major artificial intelligence (AI)-related acquisition, its first bond offering, inclusion in key stock indexes, and bullish analyst initiations. In other words, the news flow stayed strong, but the stock stopped listening. That shift reflects a familiar pattern. IPO excitement can push expectations sky-high, but eventually investors start asking tougher questions about valuation, execution, and whether ambitious promises can translate into real financial results. Now that the initial IPO euphoria is in the rearview mirror, the conversation is beginning to shift. Instead of chasing the headlines, investors are now weighing the company's fundamentals, valuation, and long-term growth prospects. So, has the recent sell-off created an attractive buying opportunity, or does SPCX still have more room to cool before it becomes compelling? About SpaceX Stock Founded in 2002, SpaceX has evolved from an ambitious rocket startup into one of the world's most influential technology companies. Headquartered in Starbase, Texas, the company operates across several fast-growing industries, including space transportation, satellite connectivity, and AI. SpaceX is best known for its reusable Falcon rockets, Dragon spacecraft, and the next-generation Starship program, which are reshaping access to space. Its Starlink unit provides high-speed satellite internet to consumers, businesses, and governments around the globe. Following its acquisition of xAI, SpaceX has also expanded deeper into AI, combining AI software with large-scale computing infrastructure. Together, these businesses have positioned SpaceX as a major player at the intersection of space, communications, and AI.
Tens of Billions in Time Value of AI Data Centers - More SpaceX AI Deals in 2026
SpaceXAI has real-world proof of 6-12 month deployments for large clusters via warehouse retrofits, phased build-out, and on-site/mobile power. They have gas turbines from partners like Solar Turbines + APR Energy that can install in days to 6-12 weeks. SpaceXAI already has 440k B200-B300 chips at Colossus 2. They need to get more cooling to activate those chips. Current power already installed supports another ~460k B300 chips. Of that new capacity, at 50-60% rented, they can do roughly 2 - 2.5 more Google-sized (110k chip, $11 Billion per year) deals by the end of 2026. By August/September, expect about 1 - 1.3 additional Google sized deals to be live and billable. Colossus 1 had 100k H100 GPUs live in ~122 days (~4 months) from groundbreaking/announcement in a former factory. Doubled to 200k GPUs in ~92 additional days. Colossus 2 (Southaven/Memphis area) had a warehouse acquired March 2025. ~200 MW cooling/IT capacity online by August 2025 (~6 months). Epoch.ai Jul 1, 2026 UPDATE on Colossus 2 and MACROHARDRR The site is estimated to have at least ~830 MW of GPU server power, with at least "at least 220,000 additional GB300 processors and over 400 additional megawatts of compute power", corresponding to the "next phase of expansion" found in the following company S-1 filing, page 76. The timing is based on the air-cooled condensers needing to be complete to handle this power capacity. The second array at MACROHARD and the first array at MACROHARDRR, although both projected to be completed prior, are not enough and more cooling capacity is needed. We estimate this expansion to be completed 90 days after April 6th. On one hand, SpaceXAI has progressively added more capacity in less time with their Colossus projects. On the other hand, 400 MW is more capacity than the previous expansions of 210 MW and 220 MW. We also believe that MACROHARDRR will be partly operational with this expansion, because its air-cooled condensor array is expected to be completed by then and fitting the entire expansion into only MACROHARD would result in extremely high levels of power density. More cooling is being added. SemiAnalysis notes this is dramatically faster than comparable efforts. xAI has publicly stated they achieved in 4 months what others estimated at 24 months. Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta, etc.) can make the building (aka shell) for AI construction in about 12-18 months in aggressive cases, but power/grid infrastructure is the dominant bottleneck (4-7+ years for utility interconnection in many markets. median queues >5 years historically). Overall planning-to-fully-live revenue-generating GW-scale clusters often span 3-5+ years, with frequent 1-2+ year delays. The huge money is being spent but how fast does the money go out before the AI chips and memory turn on? The gap is the time from cash being spent before the incremental revenue comes back.
