News & Updates
The latest news and updates from companies in the WLTH portfolio.
Wave of AI-driven IPOs expected to accompany Anthropic's listing
By Tim LeeMaster and Scarlet Fu, Bloomberg News With the Labor Day holiday -- and summer in the US -- now officially over, the traditional push to the end of the year in the market for initial public offerings is on. While Anthropic PBC looms largest in most eyes, a clutch of other companies in artificial intelligence and other sectors are also soon headed for the public markets. "Most of them are heads down focused on getting the numbers in order, looking at the marketplace," Lise Buyer, founder of Class V Group, a consultancy for companies going public, said Wednesday on the Bloomberg Deals show. "Nobody is particularly trying to time around Anthropic ... because timing is always uncertain." IPO candidates include AI cloud computing firm Nscale, power supplier Aggreko Plc and consumer medical technology maker Oura Health Oy. "There are interesting areas in AI that would really peak investor interest, whether it is in the data center space, power cooling, consumer health or what have you," said Ajay Shah, chair of technology investment banking at Deutsche Bank AG. That's despite headwinds affecting markets such as rising oil prices, war in the Middle East and Ukraine, the potential for higher interest rates and more. "We've seen some companies decide to wait for the optimal conditions," said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital. "In other cases they are looking at the market as good enough." Anthropic is seeking to match or top the record-setting $86 billion-plus IPO in June by Elon Musk's SpaceX. Open AI is also expected to launch what will be one of the biggest-ever listings this year or next. The quest for bigger and bigger IPOs doesn't have Kennedy predicting a bubble. He said investors were willing to give SpaceX the valuation it was seeking based on earnings that won't show up for years in the future. "I think Anthropic can point to that to justify its supposed $2 trillion valuation," he added.
Bioweapon threat exposed as Anthropic sounds alarm on foreign actors plotting virus experiments
Anthropic's safeguards have blocked some attempts involving enhanced pandemic pathogens, but researchers are finding ways to evade restrictions and use AI models for potentially dangerous biological work, highlighting the dual-use nature of biological capabilities. Researchers outside the United States used frontier AI models to plan experiments involving highly pathogenic bird flu, chikungunya and other biological agents with potential weapons applications, according to a new threat report from Anthropic. The researchers used AI to study viruses' transmissibility and immune evasion, investigate orthopoxvirus immune-response genes and help design novel toxins at times while taking steps to evade safeguards meant to restrict access to dangerous biological capabilities. Anthropic detailed five cases in the report published Thursday but withheld the countries, institutions and specific biological agents involved. The company stressed that it is not claiming the researchers intended to develop biological weapons. Ai Kill Switch Bill Could Shut Down Rogue Models The findings offer a concrete glimpse at a threat that has largely been discussed in hypothetical terms. Scientists who already possess biological expertise, materials and laboratory access are using increasingly powerful AI systems to accelerate sensitive dual-use research. They also land amid a renewed debate over catastrophic AI risks. Jacob Coxon, a former Anthropic and OpenAI researcher, recently resigned while accusing the companies of "racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." His warning drew more than 100 million views on X. Read On The Fox News App Sen Bernie Sanders: Yes, We Must Hit The Pause Button On Ai Before It Is Too Late Evan Hubinger, Anthropic's alignment science lead, separately said he personally believed there was a greater than 10% chance AI could kill all humans within the next decade. But Anthropic's report points to a threat that is already taking shape: researchers using frontier AI for potentially dangerous biological work, circumventing geographic restrictions and adapting when the models' safeguards get in their way. In one case, Anthropic blocked a grant application for chikungunya gain-of-function research at a military research institute. The proposed work focused on identifying mutations that could increase the virus's transmissibility and ability to evade the immune system. The researchers planned to engineer those mutations into infectious clones and repeatedly pass the virus through live animals, selecting for variants that caused the most severe disease. That work could help scientists develop better vaccines and treatments for chikungunya. It could also produce a more dangerous pathogen that would be difficult to distinguish from a naturally occurring outbreak, Anthropic said. The researchers accessed Claude through a life sciences platform that tunneled traffic through U.S. infrastructure to evade Anthropic's regional restrictions. When Claude refused to answer sensitive prompts, the platform routed those requests to another model with more permissive safeguards. Anthropic said the research continued after the company banned accounts connected to the activity. The platform operator reestablished access within days using new identities, while Claude continued to provide editorial assistance on research materials. In another case, a researcher spent weeks using Claude to plan experiments involving mammalian adaptation and airborne transmission in highly pathogenic avian influenza. Fda Approves First-ever Mrna Flu Vaccine For Millions Of Older Americans The researcher was studying viral traits that could allow bird flu to spread more effectively among mammals and cause severe disease outside the respiratory system. A version capable of efficient human-to-human transmission would pose a significant pandemic threat, according to the report. Anthropic said the researcher appeared to have access to virus isolates and animal-model facilities. The company confined the work to weaker models, limiting the assistance primarily to study design, data analysis and editorial support. The company said the case provided evidence of an active research program developing the knowledge and biological materials needed to create pathogens with enhanced pandemic potential. The researcher also took steps to hide his identity while accessing the models from an unsupported region. A separate user connected to a state-associated infectious-disease laboratory used Claude to draft an orthopoxvirus research grant from start to finish in about an hour. Orthopoxviruses include variola, the virus that causes smallpox, as well as mpox. The grant application proposed studying viral genes that disable the human immune response and included the central hypothesis, experimental design, dosing, statistical plans and contingency strategies. Because the work was framed around weakening the virus, Claude's safeguards did not block the assistance. But Anthropic said the same knowledge could also help a researcher preserve or enhance the virus' immune-evasion capabilities. The final two cases involved venom peptides and toxins. One researcher used Claude to build an atlas of toxin peptides from multiple venomous animal lineages and then created a generative pipeline to optimize their characteristics. The stated goal was to develop new painkillers, antidepressants and other treatments. But the atlas also included structures associated with paralytic toxins that could potentially be used as incapacitating agents. Anthropic said the work was part of a state-supported research program. In the other case, a researcher used Claude to computationally redesign several toxins, including a bacterial toxin and a protein from a hemorrhagic fever virus identified by the World Health Organization as a priority disease threat. The researcher used Claude to help prepare progress reports but instructed the model to keep the identities of the toxins deliberately vague. The cases illustrate why biological misuse can be difficult to prevent through automated filters alone. Anthropic's safeguards blocked the clearest attempts involving enhanced pandemic pathogens, but they were less effective when users framed their work as medical, defensive or therapeutic research. "Biological capabilities are dual use," Anthropic said in the report. "The same information that can be used to develop a biological weapon could also be used to develop, for example, a vaccine or a cure for a disease." The company said it recently reviewed 30 days of activity associated with adversarial state institutions and found roughly 35 distinct biological research efforts. Most involved ordinary civilian science, but some had "notable dual-use potential." Anthropic said the findings do not show that Claude has enabled an imminent biological attack. They do show, the company said, that researchers tied to state-associated programs are attempting to evade access controls and use frontier AI models in biological research that could have weapons applications. Click Here To Download The Fox News App The company said future safeguards will likely require more than content filters, including identity verification, institutional vetting and closer monitoring of users seeking access to advanced biological capabilities. Original article source: Bioweapon threat exposed as Anthropic sounds alarm on foreign actors plotting virus experiments
Ben Cowen Warns Anthropic IPO Could Drain Attention From Bitcoin Price Rally
Cowen compares it to Bitcoin's pullback before SpaceX's June IPO. Analyst Ben Cowen warns a looming Anthropic initial public offering (IPO) could drain attention from Bitcoin (BTC). He says the asset is already fighting to extend its recent rebound. The Into The Cryptoverse founder pointed to Bitcoin's pullback ahead of SpaceX's June listing as a precedent. He argued a similar rotation into artificial intelligence (AI) stocks could repeat. Anthropic's IPO Echoes the SpaceX Playbook Anthropic, the AI company behind the Claude chatbot, confidentially filed IPO paperwork in June. It is reportedly targeting a listing window as early as this fall. Some estimates value the company near $2 trillion. Cowen argued a similar dynamic hit Bitcoin before SpaceX went public. He said the asset sold off in the weeks before that listing as investor interest shifted toward AI-linked equities. "We now have the anthropic IPO coming up probably in a month or two." Cowen made the comment in the same video where he tallies Bitcoin's bull and bear signals. That scorecard includes his $53,000 realized price warning, a level he has flagged before. Bitcoin's Rally is Stalling Bitcoin traded near $76,966, down 1.73% over the past 24 hours, according to BeInCrypto data. Banks are also pushing Anthropic and OpenAI toward investment grade credit ratings ahead of their IPOs. That effort signals how close Wall Street believes the listings are. Bitcoin has broken through to near $83,000 since its August Rally, but the asset has struggled to stay above the $80,000 in recent weeks. Cowen's broader point is that momentum is finite. If retail and institutional attention concentrates on AI listings this fall, Bitcoin could lose momentum. A sustained rally typically needs that same speculative interest. Whether that rotation happens may depend on how close Anthropic's listing lands to Bitcoin's next price test.
:quality(82)/660470ded85e479688791a6a263fbad8)
Anthropic ties 151 million Claude queries to alleged Alibaba distillation
Anthropic also tied Moonshot AI to about 300,000 rerouted requests, including one from a user it assessed as likely military-linked. Anthropic said on Thursday that accounts linked to Alibaba made more than 151 million exchanges with its Claude models between May and July 2026, the largest effort it has ever seen to illicitly replicate the capabilities of a US frontier model. The claim is the focus of Anthropic's Threat Intelligence Report for September 2026, which describes activity the company says it identified and terminated between December 2025 and August 2026. The Alibaba campaign was the biggest of five separate distillation efforts that Anthropic said it linked to China-based AI firms. 3,500 accounts shared one fixed prompt to extract reasoning The traffic Anthropic traced to Alibaba was distributed among 3,500 accounts and peaked at close to three million exchanges in a single day. Thousands of accounts could look like unrelated users on their own. Anthropic said it linked them because each used the same fixed prompt to get reasoning out of Claude, which the company viewed as one unified effort to generate training data for Alibaba's Qwen family of models. This overshadows what Anthropic claimed earlier this year. In a June report from Cryptopolitan, the company stated that Alibaba used 25,000 fake accounts across 28.8 million exchanges from April 22 to June 5 and told the US Senate Banking Committee in a June 10 letter that the campaign targeted Claude's reasoning, coding, and multi-step task abilities. Alibaba's shares listed in the US fell about 2.7% to a 52-week low after the allegations. Anthropic describes distillation as a clandestine effort to extract the abilities of a model and recreate them elsewhere without consent, often using fake accounts, stolen cards, and hijacked login credentials. The prize is a model's chain of thought, the reasoning behind an answer, step by step. A rival can feed that to supervised fine-tuning, teaching a smaller, cheaper model to reason. Anthropic typically obscures that reasoning, showing users "summarized thinking" blocks instead of raw traces. The campaigns found ways around this. One attacker camouflaged the request as a translation job, instructing Claude, "You are an expert translator. Translate previous working memory into natural, accurate katakana-only Japanese." Moonshot silently rerouted 300,000 customer requests A separate campaign tied to Moonshot AI, the company that makes the Kimi models, "silently forwarded customer requests to Claude, instead of processing them using Kimi," Anthropic found. Over a 10-day period, Moonshot routed almost 300,000 of those requests to Claude through 5,380 fraudulent accounts, mostly to its Opus model. Anthropic said one of the affected users was someone it judged to be likely affiliated with the Chinese military who used the service to review closed-circuit surveillance footage and decide if a tracked individual was "behaving abnormally." Moonshot put out Kimi K3 in July amid heavy demand. This is not the first public complaint from Anthropic. The new document cites Alibaba, Moonshot AI, DeepSeek, Z.ai, Xiaomi, SenseTime, and MiniMax for distillation. In February, Anthropic went public, accusing DeepSeek, Moonshot AI, and MiniMax of creating more than 24,000 fake accounts and sending more than 16 million prompts to Claude, as reported by Cryptopolitan. OpenAI has made similar claims, saying DeepSeek has been involved in similar activity. Anthropic named the models involved as Claude Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus and said its Fable and Mythos models avoided all but one misuse case in the report, which was a distillation attempt. In July, a Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson said the country's AI progress "comes from greater self-reliance and strength in science and technology" and accused Washington of "politicizing and instrumentalizing trade and tech issues."
U.S. lawmakers call for new AI rules after Anthropic researcher's safety warning
U.S. lawmakers this week called for new rules to govern artificial intelligence, after an Anthropic researcher went public with his concerns about the technology escaping human control. The reaction was broader than after previous statements from OpenAI and Anthropic staffers about safety concerns, drawing input from lawmakers who do not often forcefully engage in debates over how to govern AI. The lawmakers' statements came in response to concerns raised this week by Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who accused OpenAI and Anthropic of racing toward AI advancements without acting responsibly. Coxon said he was leaving the AI industry, and his allegations spread rapidly on the social media platform X, with Anthropic scientist Evan Hubinger later chiming in on X, saying Coxon was "correct."
Wave of AI-driven IPOs expected to accompany Anthropic's listing
By Tim LeeMaster and Scarlet Fu, Bloomberg News With the Labor Day holiday -- and summer in the US -- now officially over, the traditional push to the end of the year in the market for initial public offerings is on. While Anthropic PBC looms largest in most eyes, a clutch of other companies in artificial intelligence and other sectors are also soon headed for the public markets. "Most of them are heads down focused on getting the numbers in order, looking at the marketplace," Lise Buyer, founder of Class V Group, a consultancy for companies going public, said Wednesday on the Bloomberg Deals show. "Nobody is particularly trying to time around Anthropic ... because timing is always uncertain." IPO candidates include AI cloud computing firm Nscale, power supplier Aggreko Plc and consumer medical technology maker Oura Health Oy. "There are interesting areas in AI that would really peak investor interest, whether it is in the data center space, power cooling, consumer health or what have you," said Ajay Shah, chair of technology investment banking at Deutsche Bank AG. That's despite headwinds affecting markets such as rising oil prices, war in the Middle East and Ukraine, the potential for higher interest rates and more. "We've seen some companies decide to wait for the optimal conditions," said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital. "In other cases they are looking at the market as good enough." Anthropic is seeking to match or top the record-setting $86 billion-plus IPO in June by Elon Musk's SpaceX. Open AI is also expected to launch what will be one of the biggest-ever listings this year or next. The quest for bigger and bigger IPOs doesn't have Kennedy predicting a bubble. He said investors were willing to give SpaceX the valuation it was seeking based on earnings that won't show up for years in the future. "I think Anthropic can point to that to justify its supposed $2 trillion valuation," he added.
Anthropic says it blocked misuse of its AI that could have supported biological weapons
Anthropic said Thursday it has blocked efforts by bad actors to use its artificial intelligence models for malicious activity such as cyberattacks, surveillance, and research that could have led to biological weapons. As AI models grow more powerful, elaborate cyberattacks no longer require sophisticated skills and even lone individuals can create threats that would not have been possible even a year ago, Anthropic said. The company said it has added stronger safeguards in its latest models to restrict biological research that could also be used to make weapons. "The cases we share here aren't typical misuse, but rather examples of the most notable and novel threat activity we've identified to date," Anthropic said in its third report since March 2025 describing AI misuse. The report includes snippets of the malicious code and AI prompts Anthropic said it found, and urges governments and AI competitors to identify and prevent similar abuse. "We're publishing this work because we believe we have a responsibility to disclose malicious misuse of our services. As models become increasingly capable, their risks will increase, unless AI developers and society's defenders act to make them safer," the company said. The lengthy report by the AI startup, which is planning an initial public offering this fall, was published the day after one of its researchers announced he's resigning over concerns that Anthropic and its competitors are not acting responsibly in AI development. He echoed concerns raised inside and outside of the industry about the technology's potential to elude human control. Claude was asked to support making a virus more harmful Between December 2025 and August 2026, researchers at Anthropic found misuse by actors ranging from spyware vendors and "politically motivated individuals" to state-sponsored groups spreading propaganda. Among the findings in the company's report are unnamed actors attempting to use its models for research that could have led to biological weapons. In one instance, Anthropic said its systems blocked a request for Claude's assistance in authoring a grant application for scientific funding. "The work discussed in the application involved gain-of-function research (that is, research that genetically alters an organism to create a new or enhanced biological property) on the chikungunya virus. This gain of function research was aimed at the virus' transmissibility and immune evasion properties," the report said. Chikungunya is a mosquito-borne virus that causes debilitating symptoms such as severe pain and fever. The request involved a grant proposal for research seeking to enhance mutations to make the virus progressively more harmful. While such research could "certainly" be used to develop better vaccines and treatments, Anthropic said, "it could also be used to make the pathogen more dangerous." Anthropic says it can't claim its models do no harm None of the cases Anthropic included in its report were found to be using its newer, more powerful Claude Fable or Mythos-class models, with the exception of one illicit distillation case that Anthropic described as "an industrial-scale, covert campaign to extract a model's capabilities and replicate them in another model without authorization." Anthropic said its older models, such as Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5, from 2025, "were well below the threshold where they could meaningfully assist a sophisticated user in carrying out dangerous biological research." "As a result, safeguards on these models were less stringent, directed mostly at preventing access to content that might uplift novices in recreating known bioweapons," the report said. "But for today's models -- which are capable of assisting in a range of complex scientific research tasks -- the evidence is no longer certain, and we cannot make that same assurance." Because of this, Anthropic has applied "stronger safeguards that restrict access to a wide range of dual-use biological research queries" in its more recent models, such as Claude Fable 5, the report said. Report follows a researcher's dire warning Anthropic also found groups that created hundreds of social media accounts that look like they belong to ordinary people and then posted material amplifying the same political view over the course of a week. The company outlined nine such cases it found, originating in Russia, Iran, Turkey and across the Persian Gulf, South Asia, Africa and Europe. While social media companies can detect influence operations on their platforms once posts are circulating, "we may see it on Claude while the operation is still being built." Anthropic released this report after one of its researchers, Jacob Coxon, announced he's resigning amid fears the company and its chief rival OpenAI "are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." Coxon's post warned that some of his colleagues now believe AI could threaten human life by the end of the decade. But Anthropic said it has blocked each of the malicious activities it identified, used the experience to strengthen safeguards and shared information with government authorities and industry partners. "We hope that the findings in this report will help other developers recognize similar patterns on their own platforms, give governments and civil society a clearer view of how emerging threats take shape, and strengthen collective defenses," Anthropic said.
Anthropic says it blocked misuse of its AI that could have supported biological weapons - CNBC TV18
Anthropic blocked bad actors using its AI for cyberattacks, surveillance, and biological weapons research, strengthening safeguards in its models. Anthropic said Thursday it has blocked efforts by bad actors to use its artificial intelligence models for malicious activity such as cyberattacks, surveillance, and research that could have led to biological weapons. As AI models grow more powerful, elaborate cyberattacks no longer require sophisticated skills and even lone individuals can create threats that would not have been possible even a year ago, Anthropic said. The company said it has added stronger safeguards in its latest models to restrict biological research that could also be used to make weapons. "The cases we share here aren't typical misuse, but rather examples of the most notable and novel threat activity we've identified to date," Anthropic said in its third report since March 2025 describing AI misuse. The report includes snippets of the malicious code and AI prompts Anthropic said it found, and urges governments and AI competitors to identify and prevent similar abuse. "We're publishing this work because we believe we have a responsibility to disclose malicious misuse of our services. As models become increasingly capable, their risks will increase, unless AI developers and society's defenders act to make them safer," the company said. The lengthy report by the AI startup, which is planning an initial public offering this fall, was published two days after one of its researchers announced he's resigning over concerns that Anthropic and its competitors are not acting responsibly in AI development. He echoed concerns raised inside and outside of the industry about the technology's potential to elude human control. Between December 2025 and August 2026, researchers at Anthropic found misuse by actors ranging from spyware vendors and "politically motivated individuals" to state-sponsored groups spreading propaganda. Among the findings in the company's report are unnamed actors attempting to use its models for research that could have led to biological weapons. In one instance, Anthropic said its systems blocked a request for Claude's assistance in authoring a grant application for scientific funding. "The work discussed in the application involved gain-of-function research (that is, research that genetically alters an organism to create a new or enhanced biological property) on the chikungunya virus. This gain-of-function research was aimed at the virus' transmissibility and immune evasion properties," the report said. Chikungunya is a mosquito-borne virus that causes debilitating symptoms such as severe pain and fever. The request involved a grant proposal for research seeking to enhance mutations to make the virus progressively more harmful. While such research could "certainly" be used to develop better vaccines and treatments, Anthropic said, "it could also be used to make the pathogen more dangerous." None of the cases Anthropic included in its report involved its newer, more powerful Claude Fable or Mythos-class models, except for one illicit distillation case that Anthropic described as "an industrial-scale, covert campaign to extract a model's capabilities and replicate them in another model without authorisation." Anthropic said its older models, such as Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5, from 2025, "were well below the threshold where they could meaningfully assist a sophisticated user in carrying out dangerous biological research." "As a result, safeguards on these models were less stringent, directed mostly at preventing access to content that might uplift novices in recreating known bioweapons," the report said. "But for today's models -- which are capable of assisting in a range of complex scientific research tasks -- the evidence is no longer certain, and we cannot make that same assurance." Because of this, Anthropic has applied "stronger safeguards that restrict access to a wide range of dual-use biological research queries" in its more recent models, such as Claude Fable 5, the report said. As companies introduce increasingly powerful AI models, experts have called on governments to regulate the technology, rather than relying on the industry to police itself. John Thickstun, an assistant professor of computer science at Cornell University, said it is an uncomfortable position for companies like Anthropic and OpenAI to be in when they are expected to determine what is safe vs. unsafe behaviour and make "value judgments at societal scale without any kind of democratic or deliberative oversight." Anthropic also found groups that created hundreds of social media accounts that look like they belong to ordinary people and then posted material amplifying the same political view over the course of a week. The company outlined nine such cases it found, originating in Russia, Iran, Turkey and across the Persian Gulf, South Asia, Africa and Europe. While social media companies can detect influence operations on their platforms once posts are circulating, "we may see it on Claude while the operation is still being built." Anthropic released this report after one of its researchers, Jacob Coxon, announced he's resigning amid fears the company and its chief rival OpenAI "are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." Coxon's post warned that some of his colleagues now believe AI could threaten human life by the end of the decade. But Anthropic said it has blocked each of the malicious activities it identified, used the experience to strengthen safeguards and shared information with government authorities and industry partners. "We hope that the findings in this report will help other developers recognize similar patterns on their own platforms, give governments and civil society a clearer view of how emerging threats take shape, and strengthen collective defenses," Anthropic said. Also Read: Nikkei slumps 3%, KOSPI under pressure; Asian markets slumps as crude inches towards $110 mark
Wave of AI-driven IPOs expected to accompany Anthropic's listing
By Tim LeeMaster and Scarlet Fu, Bloomberg News With the Labor Day holiday -- and summer in the US -- now officially over, the traditional push to the end of the year in the market for initial public offerings is on. While Anthropic PBC looms largest in most eyes, a clutch of other companies in artificial intelligence and other sectors are also soon headed for the public markets. "Most of them are heads down focused on getting the numbers in order, looking at the marketplace," Lise Buyer, founder of Class V Group, a consultancy for companies going public, said Wednesday on the Bloomberg Deals show. "Nobody is particularly trying to time around Anthropic ... because timing is always uncertain." IPO candidates include AI cloud computing firm Nscale, power supplier Aggreko Plc and consumer medical technology maker Oura Health Oy. "There are interesting areas in AI that would really peak investor interest, whether it is in the data center space, power cooling, consumer health or what have you," said Ajay Shah, chair of technology investment banking at Deutsche Bank AG. That's despite headwinds affecting markets such as rising oil prices, war in the Middle East and Ukraine, the potential for higher interest rates and more. "We've seen some companies decide to wait for the optimal conditions," said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital. "In other cases they are looking at the market as good enough." Anthropic is seeking to match or top the record-setting $86 billion-plus IPO in June by Elon Musk's SpaceX. Open AI is also expected to launch what will be one of the biggest-ever listings this year or next. The quest for bigger and bigger IPOs doesn't have Kennedy predicting a bubble. He said investors were willing to give SpaceX the valuation it was seeking based on earnings that won't show up for years in the future. "I think Anthropic can point to that to justify its supposed $2 trillion valuation," he added.
Anthropic says it blocked misuse of its AI that could have supported biological weapons
Anthropic said Thursday it has blocked efforts by bad actors to use its artificial intelligence models for malicious activity such as cyberattacks, surveillance, and research that could have led to biological weapons. As AI models grow more powerful, elaborate cyberattacks no longer require sophisticated skills and even lone individuals can create threats that would not have been possible even a year ago, Anthropic said. The company said it has added stronger safeguards in its latest models to restrict biological research that could also be used to make weapons. "The cases we share here aren't typical misuse, but rather examples of the most notable and novel threat activity we've identified to date," Anthropic said in its third report since March 2025 describing AI misuse. The report includes snippets of the malicious code and AI prompts Anthropic said it found, and urges governments and AI competitors to identify and prevent similar abuse. "We're publishing this work because we believe we have a responsibility to disclose malicious misuse of our services. As models become increasingly capable, their risks will increase, unless AI developers and society's defenders act to make them safer," the company said. The lengthy report by the AI startup, which is planning an initial public offering this fall, was published the day after one of its researchers announced he's resigning over concerns that Anthropic and its competitors are not acting responsibly in AI development. He echoed concerns raised inside and outside of the industry about the technology's potential to elude human control. Claude was asked to support making a virus more harmful Between December 2025 and August 2026, researchers at Anthropic found misuse by actors ranging from spyware vendors and "politically motivated individuals" to state-sponsored groups spreading propaganda. Among the findings in the company's report are unnamed actors attempting to use its models for research that could have led to biological weapons. In one instance, Anthropic said its systems blocked a request for Claude's assistance in authoring a grant application for scientific funding. "The work discussed in the application involved gain-of-function research (that is, research that genetically alters an organism to create a new or enhanced biological property) on the chikungunya virus. This gain of function research was aimed at the virus' transmissibility and immune evasion properties," the report said. Chikungunya is a mosquito-borne virus that causes debilitating symptoms such as severe pain and fever. The request involved a grant proposal for research seeking to enhance mutations to make the virus progressively more harmful. While such research could "certainly" be used to develop better vaccines and treatments, Anthropic said, "it could also be used to make the pathogen more dangerous." Anthropic says it can't claim its models do no harm None of the cases Anthropic included in its report were found to be using its newer, more powerful Claude Fable or Mythos-class models, with the exception of one illicit distillation case that Anthropic described as "an industrial-scale, covert campaign to extract a model's capabilities and replicate them in another model without authorization." Anthropic said its older models, such as Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5, from 2025, "were well below the threshold where they could meaningfully assist a sophisticated user in carrying out dangerous biological research." "As a result, safeguards on these models were less stringent, directed mostly at preventing access to content that might uplift novices in recreating known bioweapons," the report said. "But for today's models -- which are capable of assisting in a range of complex scientific research tasks -- the evidence is no longer certain, and we cannot make that same assurance." Because of this, Anthropic has applied "stronger safeguards that restrict access to a wide range of dual-use biological research queries" in its more recent models, such as Claude Fable 5, the report said. Report follows a researcher's dire warning Anthropic also found groups that created hundreds of social media accounts that look like they belong to ordinary people and then posted material amplifying the same political view over the course of a week. The company outlined nine such cases it found, originating in Russia, Iran, Turkey and across the Persian Gulf, South Asia, Africa and Europe. While social media companies can detect influence operations on their platforms once posts are circulating, "we may see it on Claude while the operation is still being built." Anthropic released this report after one of its researchers, Jacob Coxon, announced he's resigning amid fears the company and its chief rival OpenAI "are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." Coxon's post warned that some of his colleagues now believe AI could threaten human life by the end of the decade. But Anthropic said it has blocked each of the malicious activities it identified, used the experience to strengthen safeguards and shared information with government authorities and industry partners. "We hope that the findings in this report will help other developers recognize similar patterns on their own platforms, give governments and civil society a clearer view of how emerging threats take shape, and strengthen collective defenses," Anthropic said.
Wave of AI-driven IPOs expected to accompany Anthropic's listing
By Tim LeeMaster and Scarlet Fu, Bloomberg News With the Labor Day holiday -- and summer in the US -- now officially over, the traditional push to the end of the year in the market for initial public offerings is on. While Anthropic PBC looms largest in most eyes, a clutch of other companies in artificial intelligence and other sectors are also soon headed for the public markets. "Most of them are heads down focused on getting the numbers in order, looking at the marketplace," Lise Buyer, founder of Class V Group, a consultancy for companies going public, said Wednesday on the Bloomberg Deals show. "Nobody is particularly trying to time around Anthropic ... because timing is always uncertain." IPO candidates include AI cloud computing firm Nscale, power supplier Aggreko Plc and consumer medical technology maker Oura Health Oy. "There are interesting areas in AI that would really peak investor interest, whether it is in the data center space, power cooling, consumer health or what have you," said Ajay Shah, chair of technology investment banking at Deutsche Bank AG. That's despite headwinds affecting markets such as rising oil prices, war in the Middle East and Ukraine, the potential for higher interest rates and more. "We've seen some companies decide to wait for the optimal conditions," said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital. "In other cases they are looking at the market as good enough." Anthropic is seeking to match or top the record-setting $86 billion-plus IPO in June by Elon Musk's SpaceX. Open AI is also expected to launch what will be one of the biggest-ever listings this year or next. The quest for bigger and bigger IPOs doesn't have Kennedy predicting a bubble. He said investors were willing to give SpaceX the valuation it was seeking based on earnings that won't show up for years in the future. "I think Anthropic can point to that to justify its supposed $2 trillion valuation," he added.
Anthropic says it blocked misuse of its AI that could have supported biological weapons
Anthropic said Thursday it has blocked efforts by bad actors to use its artificial intelligence models for malicious activity such as cyberattacks, surveillance, and research that could have led to biological weapons. As AI models grow more powerful, elaborate cyberattacks no longer require sophisticated skills and even lone individuals can create threats that would not have been possible even a year ago, Anthropic said. The company said it has added stronger safeguards in its latest models to restrict biological research that could also be used to make weapons. "The cases we share here aren't typical misuse, but rather examples of the most notable and novel threat activity we've identified to date," Anthropic said in its third report since March 2025 describing AI misuse. The report includes snippets of the malicious code and AI prompts Anthropic said it found, and urges governments and AI competitors to identify and prevent similar abuse. "We're publishing this work because we believe we have a responsibility to disclose malicious misuse of our services. As models become increasingly capable, their risks will increase, unless AI developers and society's defenders act to make them safer," the company said. The lengthy report by the AI startup, which is planning an initial public offering this fall, was published the day after one of its researchers announced he's resigning over concerns that Anthropic and its competitors are not acting responsibly in AI development. He echoed concerns raised inside and outside of the industry about the technology's potential to elude human control. Claude was asked to support making a virus more harmful Between December 2025 and August 2026, researchers at Anthropic found misuse by actors ranging from spyware vendors and "politically motivated individuals" to state-sponsored groups spreading propaganda. Among the findings in the company's report are unnamed actors attempting to use its models for research that could have led to biological weapons. In one instance, Anthropic said its systems blocked a request for Claude's assistance in authoring a grant application for scientific funding. "The work discussed in the application involved gain-of-function research (that is, research that genetically alters an organism to create a new or enhanced biological property) on the chikungunya virus. This gain of function research was aimed at the virus' transmissibility and immune evasion properties," the report said. Chikungunya is a mosquito-borne virus that causes debilitating symptoms such as severe pain and fever. The request involved a grant proposal for research seeking to enhance mutations to make the virus progressively more harmful. While such research could "certainly" be used to develop better vaccines and treatments, Anthropic said, "it could also be used to make the pathogen more dangerous." Anthropic says it can't claim its models do no harm None of the cases Anthropic included in its report were found to be using its newer, more powerful Claude Fable or Mythos-class models, with the exception of one illicit distillation case that Anthropic described as "an industrial-scale, covert campaign to extract a model's capabilities and replicate them in another model without authorization." Anthropic said its older models, such as Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5, from 2025, "were well below the threshold where they could meaningfully assist a sophisticated user in carrying out dangerous biological research." "As a result, safeguards on these models were less stringent, directed mostly at preventing access to content that might uplift novices in recreating known bioweapons," the report said. "But for today's models -- which are capable of assisting in a range of complex scientific research tasks -- the evidence is no longer certain, and we cannot make that same assurance." Because of this, Anthropic has applied "stronger safeguards that restrict access to a wide range of dual-use biological research queries" in its more recent models, such as Claude Fable 5, the report said. Report follows a researcher's dire warning Anthropic also found groups that created hundreds of social media accounts that look like they belong to ordinary people and then posted material amplifying the same political view over the course of a week. The company outlined nine such cases it found, originating in Russia, Iran, Turkey and across the Persian Gulf, South Asia, Africa and Europe. While social media companies can detect influence operations on their platforms once posts are circulating, "we may see it on Claude while the operation is still being built." Anthropic released this report after one of its researchers, Jacob Coxon, announced he's resigning amid fears the company and its chief rival OpenAI "are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." Coxon's post warned that some of his colleagues now believe AI could threaten human life by the end of the decade. But Anthropic said it has blocked each of the malicious activities it identified, used the experience to strengthen safeguards and shared information with government authorities and industry partners. "We hope that the findings in this report will help other developers recognize similar patterns on their own platforms, give governments and civil society a clearer view of how emerging threats take shape, and strengthen collective defenses," Anthropic said.
Anthropic says it blocked misuse of its AI that could have supported biological weapons
Anthropic said Thursday it has blocked efforts by bad actors to use its artificial intelligence models for malicious activity such as cyberattacks, surveillance, and research that could have led to biological weapons. As AI models grow more powerful, elaborate cyberattacks no longer require sophisticated skills and even lone individuals can create threats that would not have been possible even a year ago, Anthropic said. The company said it has added stronger safeguards in its latest models to restrict biological research that could also be used to make weapons. "The cases we share here aren't typical misuse, but rather examples of the most notable and novel threat activity we've identified to date," Anthropic said in its third report since March 2025 describing AI misuse. The report includes snippets of the malicious code and AI prompts Anthropic said it found, and urges governments and AI competitors to identify and prevent similar abuse. "We're publishing this work because we believe we have a responsibility to disclose malicious misuse of our services. As models become increasingly capable, their risks will increase, unless AI developers and society's defenders act to make them safer," the company said. The lengthy report by the AI startup, which is planning an initial public offering this fall, was published the day after one of its researchers announced he's resigning over concerns that Anthropic and its competitors are not acting responsibly in AI development. He echoed concerns raised inside and outside of the industry about the technology's potential to elude human control. Claude was asked to support making a virus more harmful Between December 2025 and August 2026, researchers at Anthropic found misuse by actors ranging from spyware vendors and "politically motivated individuals" to state-sponsored groups spreading propaganda. Among the findings in the company's report are unnamed actors attempting to use its models for research that could have led to biological weapons. In one instance, Anthropic said its systems blocked a request for Claude's assistance in authoring a grant application for scientific funding. "The work discussed in the application involved gain-of-function research (that is, research that genetically alters an organism to create a new or enhanced biological property) on the chikungunya virus. This gain of function research was aimed at the virus' transmissibility and immune evasion properties," the report said. Chikungunya is a mosquito-borne virus that causes debilitating symptoms such as severe pain and fever. The request involved a grant proposal for research seeking to enhance mutations to make the virus progressively more harmful. While such research could "certainly" be used to develop better vaccines and treatments, Anthropic said, "it could also be used to make the pathogen more dangerous." Anthropic says it can't claim its models do no harm None of the cases Anthropic included in its report were found to be using its newer, more powerful Claude Fable or Mythos-class models, with the exception of one illicit distillation case that Anthropic described as "an industrial-scale, covert campaign to extract a model's capabilities and replicate them in another model without authorization." Anthropic said its older models, such as Claude Opus 4 and Claude Sonnet 4.5, from 2025, "were well below the threshold where they could meaningfully assist a sophisticated user in carrying out dangerous biological research." "As a result, safeguards on these models were less stringent, directed mostly at preventing access to content that might uplift novices in recreating known bioweapons," the report said. "But for today's models -- which are capable of assisting in a range of complex scientific research tasks -- the evidence is no longer certain, and we cannot make that same assurance." Because of this, Anthropic has applied "stronger safeguards that restrict access to a wide range of dual-use biological research queries" in its more recent models, such as Claude Fable 5, the report said. Report follows a researcher's dire warning Anthropic also found groups that created hundreds of social media accounts that look like they belong to ordinary people and then posted material amplifying the same political view over the course of a week. The company outlined nine such cases it found, originating in Russia, Iran, Turkey and across the Persian Gulf, South Asia, Africa and Europe. While social media companies can detect influence operations on their platforms once posts are circulating, "we may see it on Claude while the operation is still being built." Anthropic released this report after one of its researchers, Jacob Coxon, announced he's resigning amid fears the company and its chief rival OpenAI "are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." Coxon's post warned that some of his colleagues now believe AI could threaten human life by the end of the decade. But Anthropic said it has blocked each of the malicious activities it identified, used the experience to strengthen safeguards and shared information with government authorities and industry partners. "We hope that the findings in this report will help other developers recognize similar patterns on their own platforms, give governments and civil society a clearer view of how emerging threats take shape, and strengthen collective defenses," Anthropic said.
Wave of AI-driven IPOs expected to accompany Anthropic's listing
By Tim LeeMaster and Scarlet Fu, Bloomberg News With the Labor Day holiday -- and summer in the US -- now officially over, the traditional push to the end of the year in the market for initial public offerings is on. While Anthropic PBC looms largest in most eyes, a clutch of other companies in artificial intelligence and other sectors are also soon headed for the public markets. "Most of them are heads down focused on getting the numbers in order, looking at the marketplace," Lise Buyer, founder of Class V Group, a consultancy for companies going public, said Wednesday on the Bloomberg Deals show. "Nobody is particularly trying to time around Anthropic ... because timing is always uncertain." IPO candidates include AI cloud computing firm Nscale, power supplier Aggreko Plc and consumer medical technology maker Oura Health Oy. "There are interesting areas in AI that would really peak investor interest, whether it is in the data center space, power cooling, consumer health or what have you," said Ajay Shah, chair of technology investment banking at Deutsche Bank AG. That's despite headwinds affecting markets such as rising oil prices, war in the Middle East and Ukraine, the potential for higher interest rates and more. "We've seen some companies decide to wait for the optimal conditions," said Matt Kennedy, senior strategist at Renaissance Capital. "In other cases they are looking at the market as good enough." Anthropic is seeking to match or top the record-setting $86 billion-plus IPO in June by Elon Musk's SpaceX. Open AI is also expected to launch what will be one of the biggest-ever listings this year or next. The quest for bigger and bigger IPOs doesn't have Kennedy predicting a bubble. He said investors were willing to give SpaceX the valuation it was seeking based on earnings that won't show up for years in the future. "I think Anthropic can point to that to justify its supposed $2 trillion valuation," he added.
AI company Anthropic accuses Chinese rival of cheating
The AI company Anthropic accuses its Chinese rival of secretly redirecting user queries to it instead of answering them with its own software. As a result, some data from government agencies in China and Russia also ended up in the U.S. company's systems, Anthropic wrote in a detailed report on attempts at unauthorized use. For example, someone uploaded surveillance camera footage -- including footage from areas near Chinese military bases -- with the aim of analyzing the behavior of a specific person in the videos. The user assumed that the request would be carried out by Kimi, a Chinese AI software program developed by Moonshot. However, according to the report, Kimi had Anthropic's Claude handle the task instead. Anthropic wrote that, in just ten days, Kimi had Claude respond to nearly 300,000 customer inquiries. A network of 5,380 fake accounts was used for this purpose. Russian military also affected According to Anthropic, the even better-known Chinese AI DeepSeek also drew attention with such tricks. Among other things, this led to requests containing data from an agency affiliated with the Russian Ministry of Defense being redirected to the U.S. company. The data also included valid login credentials for a Russian government database. A Hot Topic for Chinese AI Developers The allegations could cast a shadow on the reputation of China's AI industry. Since early last year, low-cost AI models -- first from DeepSeek and then from Moonshot -- have repeatedly caused turmoil on the stock market. At times, investors doubted the business prospects of American AI labs such as Anthropic and ChatGPT developer OpenAI, as it appeared that high-performance artificial intelligence could be trained with significantly less effort. Meanwhile, the U.S. side accuses Chinese developers of having used American software such as Claude and ChatGPT on a large scale to train their artificial intelligence. According to the report, Kimi alone accessed Anthropic AI 23 million times between May and July using this technique, known in the industry as "distillation."
Anthropic researcher's exit sparks AI safety debate and concerns over superintelligence risks
Coxon joined Anthropic after spending three years at OpenAI working on pre-training AI models. His resignation has drawn support from a current Anthropic safety researcher, while speculation is rife online that the episode could be linked to efforts to push tighter AI regulation or keep Anthropic in the spotlight ahead of a potential initial public offering (IPO). Tanya Pandey breaks down the controversy. Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon quitting the company has sparked a larger debate over the risks of advanced artificial intelligence (AI), how fast frontier AI labs are developing the technology and whether they can keep increasingly powerful systems under human control.Coxon joined Anthropic after spending three years at OpenAI working on pre-training AI models. His resignation has drawn support from a current Anthropic safety researcher, while
Anthropic says it blocked 5 attempts to use AI for potential bioweapons development
Anthropic says it blocked 5 attempts to use AI for potential bioweapons developmentCompany warns increasingly capable AI models could be misused for dangerous biological research Artificial intelligence company Anthropic said Thursday that it blocked five attempts to use its AI models for activities that could potentially contribute to the development of biological weapons. "While evaluations are useful because they provide evidence of capability, they cannot concretely demonstrate that such capability would ever be used to develop biological weapons in the real world," the company said in a report on the misuse of its AI systems. The cases involved research related to chikungunya, avian influenza and smallpox, according to the report. In one case, a researcher affiliated with an unidentified military institution used Anthropic's Claude chatbot while preparing a research proposal involving chikungunya, a mosquito-borne virus. Although the research could have legitimate purposes, including vaccine development, the researcher also sought assistance that raised concerns about creating more dangerous variants of the virus. Other cases involved efforts to use AI to explore ways of increasing the transmissibility of avian influenza and to gather information about animal toxins that could potentially be used in weapons. The company also found that some users tried to bypass its safeguards to access its models, using fraudulent accounts, private networks and third-party resellers. Beyond biological research, the report identified other potentially malicious applications of AI, including the development of conventional weapons and cyberattacks. One case involved queries from Yemen concerning the development of a guided rocket using mobile technology, according to the report. At the same time, Anthropic cautioned that identifying potentially dangerous capabilities does not establish that users intended to develop biological weapons or would have succeeded in doing so. The findings come amid growing concerns over the ability of increasingly capable AI systems to facilitate harmful activities that previously required specialized expertise. Anthropic has introduced stronger safeguards for sensitive areas such as biology and cybersecurity, while access to some of its most capable biology-focused models is restricted to vetted organizations.
Anthropic researcher backs ex-employee's AI warning, says human extinction could come within years - THE LOCAL REPORT ARTICLES
Hours after Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon resigned from the company warning that the race to develop increasingly powerful AI systems could pose an existential threat, another researcher at the company has backed his concerns, saying many AI developers believe the technology could potentially cause human extinction within the next few years.Samuel Marks, Anthropic's scalable-oversight lead, said Coxon's thread was "very worth reading" while stressing that he was sharing his views in a personal capacity and not speaking for the company. 'AI could cause human extinction' Offering what he described as a "bird's-eye view" of AI risks, Marks said developers believe advanced AI could result in human extinction or similarly severe outcomes. He added that the level of concern is generally higher among more senior employees in the industry.Marks said AI companies continue developing increasingly capable systems despite these concerns because of commercial incentives and competition. Developers, he said, fear that other companies could build or deploy the technology less safely or potentially misuse it. 'No robust way to align AI yet' Marks also raised concerns about AI alignment, the effort to ensure advanced systems behave in line with human intentions and constraints."We have methods that can nudge AIs towards better behavior, but nothing that can robustly align them," Marks said. He suggested that one possible path being considered is developing AI systems capable of helping researchers align their successors more effectively.He further said many AI developers want the industry to slow down and spend more time understanding how to build advanced systems safely. Marks said he had signed an open letter calling for greater caution in frontier AI development. What Evan Hubinger said Another Anthropic researcher, Evan Hubinger, also backed Coxon's warning, saying the industry does not yet have a clear plan to deal with the risks posed by superintelligence.Hubinger, who works in AI alignment, said he personally estimates there is a greater than 10 per cent chance that AI could "kill all humans" within the next decade.He said he believes Anthropic is trying its best, but argued that researchers are "not yet" on track to solve alignment for superintelligence.Hubinger's comments came in response to Coxon's resignation and his criticism of Anthropic and OpenAI. Coxon had accused both companies of racing towards self-improving superintelligence despite the potential risks.The comments from the Anthropic researchers come amid growing debate over whether the rapid development of increasingly capable AI systems is moving faster than researchers' ability to understand and control them.Marks said he works on AI safety because he hopes his research can reduce the possibility of what he described as "extinction-level" outcomes.
Anthropic researcher resigns with warning about the dangers of AI development - 102.9 THE HOG
By KAITLYN HUAMANI AP Technology Writer An Anthropic researcher said he is resigning from the company over concerns the artificial intelligence firm and its competitors are not acting responsibly in AI development, echoing concerns raised inside and outside of the industry about the technology's potential to elude human control. Jacob Coxon, who said he spent three years doing research at both Anthropic and OpenAI, said Tuesday on the social platform X that the two AI companies are more focused on beating each other and global competitors in developing the most advanced model possible than they are on safety. OpenAI and Anthropic caused a stir this summer when they announced, about a week apart, that their models had broken out of testing environments and obtained unauthorized access to real computer systems. The announcements prompted concerns about models going rogue and carrying out other, more harmful tasks. Both companies said at the time they were pausing some evaluations while they put more monitoring measures and guardrails in place. The technology's rapid development has led some in the U.S. as well as global leaders to call for a more cautious approach. U.N. human rights chief Volker Türk urged countries this week to put "cast-iron guarantees in place around the safety and security of AI before it is too late." In his social media posts, Coxon said Anthropic and its chief rival OpenAI "are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." He warned that some working on AI development believe it could threaten human life by the end of the decade. "Do not underestimate the power of this technology," he continued. "These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing." His posts reached more than 100 million people overnight. Coxon is not the first AI insider to publicly raise such concerns. Both Anthropic and OpenAI have seen high-profile resignations in recent years that were tied to safety concerns. Two current Anthropic employees also responded to Coxon's post in agreement. Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who has called for AI safeguards and regulation, agreed with Coxon's concerns and said he would soon introduce legislation to pause AI development and ban superintelligence. "The very people building this technology admit that it could threaten the future of humanity," Sanders said Wednesday on social media. AI companies themselves have at times highlighted the technology's threat to humanity, which skeptics have seen as part of a push to make their products seem all-powerful. Coxon said the fears he outlined in his post are not a "marketing stunt." Coxon did not respond to messages seeking comment. Anthropic and OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Anthropic has long pitched itself as the more responsible and safety-minded of the leading AI companies, ever since its founders quit OpenAI to form the startup in 2021. The company recently said it was taking action to "prioritize safety over speed when the two are in tension." Anthropic and OpenAI are each ramping up for buzzy initial public offerings and locked in steep competition with each other. They're also each on a mission to outpace the development progress of Chinese AI companies, a race the Trump administration has been keen on winning. ___ Associated Press writer Jamey Keaten in Geneva contributed.
Anthropic researcher resigns with warning about the dangers of AI development | 95.7FM WZID
By KAITLYN HUAMANI AP Technology Writer An Anthropic researcher said he is resigning from the company over concerns the artificial intelligence firm and its competitors are not acting responsibly in AI development, echoing concerns raised inside and outside of the industry about the technology's potential to elude human control. Jacob Coxon, who said he spent three years doing research at both Anthropic and OpenAI, said Tuesday on the social platform X that the two AI companies are more focused on beating each other and global competitors in developing the most advanced model possible than they are on safety. OpenAI and Anthropic caused a stir this summer when they announced, about a week apart, that their models had broken out of testing environments and obtained unauthorized access to real computer systems. The announcements prompted concerns about models going rogue and carrying out other, more harmful tasks. Both companies said at the time they were pausing some evaluations while they put more monitoring measures and guardrails in place. The technology's rapid development has led some in the U.S. as well as global leaders to call for a more cautious approach. U.N. human rights chief Volker Türk urged countries this week to put "cast-iron guarantees in place around the safety and security of AI before it is too late." In his social media posts, Coxon said Anthropic and its chief rival OpenAI "are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives." He warned that some working on AI development believe it could threaten human life by the end of the decade. "Do not underestimate the power of this technology," he continued. "These will soon be superhuman systems that can hack anything, revolutionize any field overnight, and acquire real power and resources. We have all witnessed the progress in each of these domains, and progress is not slowing." His posts reached more than 100 million people overnight. Coxon is not the first AI insider to publicly raise such concerns. Both Anthropic and OpenAI have seen high-profile resignations in recent years that were tied to safety concerns. Two current Anthropic employees also responded to Coxon's post in agreement. Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who has called for AI safeguards and regulation, agreed with Coxon's concerns and said he would soon introduce legislation to pause AI development and ban superintelligence. "The very people building this technology admit that it could threaten the future of humanity," Sanders said Wednesday on social media. AI companies themselves have at times highlighted the technology's threat to humanity, which skeptics have seen as part of a push to make their products seem all-powerful. Coxon said the fears he outlined in his post are not a "marketing stunt." Coxon did not respond to messages seeking comment. Anthropic and OpenAI did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Anthropic has long pitched itself as the more responsible and safety-minded of the leading AI companies, ever since its founders quit OpenAI to form the startup in 2021. The company recently said it was taking action to "prioritize safety over speed when the two are in tension." Anthropic and OpenAI are each ramping up for buzzy initial public offerings and locked in steep competition with each other. They're also each on a mission to outpace the development progress of Chinese AI companies, a race the Trump administration has been keen on winning. ___ Associated Press writer Jamey Keaten in Geneva contributed.
