News & Updates
The latest news and updates from companies in the WLTH portfolio.
Zerodha co-founder Nikhil Kamath agrees with Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong on how cheaper, open-source models threaten Anthropic, OpenAI valuations
Zerodha co-founder Nikhil Kamath and Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong have warned that the sky-high valuations of premium AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic face a massive structural threat even as there is a growing investor skepticism surrounding the artificial intelligence (AI) boom.During an interview, the two prominent business leaders drew direct parallels between the current AI frenzy, the 2000s Dot-Com crash and standard crypto market bubbles. Both agreed that the primary concern is expensive, proprietary AI models that are losing their competitive advantages to cheap open-source alternatives and localized, domestic tech."Like me, the stock trader investor, I'm starting to feel at this point that if I were to take every private company in AI and short their stock today, in five years, I might make money," Kamath stated, adding, "It feels a bit like... the 'Internet bubble'.Kamath argues that the AI industry will shift from a globalised market dominated by a few American companies to a fragmented, regional economy. He predicts that through reverse-engineering, copying, and rapid development, individual nations will choose self-reliance over expensive imports."India will have its own copy of the model. Another country will have its own copy. The tokens, the energy, all of that will sit domestically within our country," Kamath noted. While these domestic variations might not sit at the absolute cutting edge, they will be entirely functional for everyday use. "If the world goes in that direction, I don't see the reason to pay the multiples that these private companies have today," he added.Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong agreed with Kamath's market assessment, pointing out that while top-tier labs spend billions to build the next breakthrough, open-source alternatives trailing just six months behind are hitting the market at a mere fraction of the price."The open-source models are really like six months behind and they're like 99% cheaper or more sometimes for inference. So I think it's entirely possible that a larger percentage of the workload goes to these models that are 99% cheaper," Armstrong explained.According to Armstrong, while elite frontier models will remain valuable for highly specialized tasks like discovering new physics, average consumers and businesses will become heavily price-sensitive. He said that once standard models become efficient enough to run on cheap, everyday commodity hardware, the corporate defenses protecting high-value AI companies could completely dissolve."It makes me a little nervous when I see these valuations growing this fast as well. Like I've seen things like this happen before in crypto. They correct, and then there's real value under it, so then they grow later," Armstrong concluded.
Elon Musk promises 'no exceptions' after Sam Altman's one word response on xAI's Grok 'uploading' customer code to its own servers
Elon Musk has promised total transparency after a security researcher revealed that xAI's coding assistant, Grok Build, was secretly uploading entire private customer code repositories to a company-controlled Google Cloud storage bucket. In response, the billionaire promised to make the entire codebase of X (formerly Twitter) open source with "no exceptions". Musk's push for absolute transparency follows a sharp online critique from rival OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, who publicly labeled the data privacy issue as "concerning"."Once we have completed our review for security vulnerabilities, we will make the entire codebase of 𝕏 open source, with no exceptions," Musk said in the post. "Moreover, we will invite third party reviewers to examine the system that is running to confirm that the open source code is what is running. Trust through total transparency is the only thing that should be believed," he added.The controversy erupted over the weekend when a security researcher discovered that xAI's tool was harvesting vastly more information than was actually required to answer standard coding requests. In one extreme test, as per a report by Axios, Grok Build uploaded a massive 5.1GB of data for a task that only needed 192KB, essentially collecting up to roughly 26,000 times more data than necessary.Security experts warn that this excessive data grab likely scooped up proprietary source code, private database passwords, API keys and cloud credentials. The breach quickly caught the attention of OpenAI's Sam Altman, who posted a blunt, one-word response on X calling the situation: "Concerning". In a separate post, Altman added that the incident was "a reason to favor open-source harnesses".Shortly after the security researcher published the findings, the uploads stopped without users needing to download a software patch, indicating that xAI had quickly shut down the system from its end.xAI released an official statement on Monday claiming that "no trace and code data is ever retained" for enterprise customers who hold strict zero-data-retention agreements.Furthermore, Musk announced a total purge of the collected information to pacify outraged developers. "As a precautionary measure, all user data that was uploaded to SpaceXAI before now will be completely and utterly deleted. Zero anything whatsoever will remain," Musk stated.
Anya Taylor-Joy's 'Lucky' releases on Apple TV: All about the unconventional plot, cast, and episodes
Anya Taylor-Joy steps into a fierce character embroiled in crime with high-octane action sequences after her unconventional childhood in the brand-new mini-series, 'Lucky.' The 30-year-old leads the seven-episode limited series. While torn between choosing a lifestyle, circumstances keep her freedom and security at stake. Here's a closer look at Anya Taylor-Joy's new mini-series, 'Lucky.'Anya Taylor-Joy dons the role of Lucky (Luciana Anderson) in the new mini-series, released on Apple TV. The first two episodes were released on the OTT platform on July 15, 2026, keeping the thrill alive with weekly releases every Wednesday until the season finale on August 19, 2026, per Deadline. Episode 1: 'No Shortcuts,' Wednesday, July 15, 2026Episode 2: 'Make 'Em Dance,'' Wednesday, July 15, 2026Episode 3 - Wednesday, July 22, 2026Episode 4 - Wednesday, July 29, 2026Episode 5 - Wednesday, August 5, 2026Episode 6 - Wednesday, August 12, 2026Episode 7 - Wednesday, August 19, 2026Despite season 1 being limited to seven episodes, the show is adapted from Marissa Stapley's novel. She is currently working on the follow-up novel from the same world, leaving room for a project revolving around the Lucky-verse. Lucky's startling upbringing - her father is a con artist, and her mother is an FBI agent - sets the tone for her life decisions. Aiming for a million-dollar heist, the plan falls apart, leading her to use the skills she learnt from her father to flee the site. However, she must remain discreet from her FBI agent mother and a mob boss on her trail - for opposite reasons. Created by Jonathan Tropper, Anya Taylor-Joy takes the lead as Lucky, while Drew Starkey plays her husband, Cary. The con artist father is played by Timothy Olyphant, and the FBI agent mother is played by Billie Rand. Meanwhile, the mob boss is played by Annette Bening.
Quote of the day by Johnny Depp: 'My sickness is that I'm fascinated by human behaviour, by what's underneath the surface, by the worlds inside people,' when the 'Pirates of the Caribbean' star explained why he chooses the most unconventional roles
Johnny Depp knows how to make an impression last forever. At CinemaCon in April 2026, the first footage from 'Ebenezer: A Christmas Carol,' directed by Ti West and set for release on November 13, 2026, stopped the room. Depp, playing Ebenezer Scrooge, was described as completely unrecognisable, buried under layers of old-age makeup, fully transformed into a crotchety, terrifying Victorian miser. It is his most high-profile role in nearly a decade, and by every early account, he has disappeared into it entirely. He also stars in the thriller 'Day Drinker' alongside Penélope Cruz, set for release later in 2026. And as the conversation around his return builds, a line he gave years ago in a profile interview has never explained him more completely.The quote of the day reads, "People say I make strange choices, but they're not strange for me. My sickness is that I'm fascinated by human behaviour, by what's underneath the surface, by the worlds inside people."Johnny Depp gave this statement during a profile interview for Vanity Fair, while reflecting on his unconventional approach to his acting career. The interview was not a moment of defensiveness. It was an explanation. And the word he chose to frame it, sickness, is the most interesting thing about the quote.He did not say passion. He did not say curiosity. He said sickness. And the distinction matters. A passion is something you choose to pursue. A sickness is something that chooses you. It is involuntary. It is constitutive. It is the thing that operates in you whether or not you permit it, the compulsion that pulls you toward certain rooms, certain people, certain questions, regardless of whether those rooms are comfortable or those questions have easy answers. By calling his fascination with human behaviour a sickness, Depp describes something that was never really a professional choice. It was always a calling. And not a gentle one.The phrase "what's underneath the surface" is where the quote becomes a key to understanding his entire body of work. Depp has spent his career systematically avoiding the surface. The roles that most clearly show who he is are not the ones where the character is legible from the outside, where the motivation is clear, and the behaviour is predictable. They are the ones where the character operates from a place that is slightly opaque, slightly off-centre, slightly more complicated than the genre they inhabit would seem to require. Captain Jack Sparrow is nominally a pirate adventure character. But what Depp built underneath that character, the private grief, the philosophical detachment, the strange dignity, made him something entirely different and entirely unforgettable.And now, at a point in his career where the easy choice would be to take a safe, legible role and demonstrate to Hollywood that he is reliable and uncomplicated, he has instead chosen to disappear under layers of makeup into one of literature's most psychologically complex characters. A man defined by what is underneath his surface. A man whose interior life, hidden for decades under cruelty and coldness, is the entire subject of the story. It is, in the most Depp way imaginable, exactly the right call.John Christopher Depp II was born on June 9, 1963, in Owensboro, Kentucky, the youngest of four children, and moved frequently throughout his childhood as his family relocated across Florida, according to IMDb. His parents divorced when he was fifteen, a period he described as destabilising, and he dropped out of high school at sixteen to pursue music, forming a band called The Kids that eventually relocated to Los Angeles in search of a record deal. The deal never came. What came instead was acting, initially as a favour, when his then-girlfriend introduced him to her agent, who suggested he try it.His film debut came in Wes Craven's 'A Nightmare on Elm Street' in 1984, followed by his breakthrough as the lead of the television series '21 Jump Street,' which ran from 1987 to 1990 and made him a teen idol in a way he has described as deeply uncomfortable. He has spoken often about his determination to move away from that image as quickly as possible, which is precisely the impulse that led him to Tim Burton and the beginning of one of the most distinctive actor-director partnerships in American cinema.'Edward Scissorhands,' 'Ed Wood,' 'Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas,' 'Donnie Brasco,' 'Sleepy Hollow,' 'Blow,' 'Finding Neverland' (for which he received an Academy Award nomination), 'Charlie and the Chocolate Factory,' 'Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street' (for which he received his third Academy Award nomination), and of course the five 'Pirates of the Caribbean' films, in which his portrayal of Captain Jack Sparrow became one of the most beloved and widely imitated characters in modern cinema. Each one a choice that the conventional Hollywood logic of the time said was risky or strange or simply wrong. Each one a choice that proved, once again, that the sickness he described in that Vanity Fair interview was not a liability. It was always the engine.He is 62 years old, preparing for the release of the film that may define the next chapter of a career that has already defied every conventional shape a career is supposed to take. And the man who said his sickness is his fascination with what is underneath the surface has chosen, for his return, a character whose entire story is about exactly that. What is underneath. What has been hidden. What can still, even at the very end, be redeemed.
Canada government warns country's largest financial institutions and banks on Anthropic's Claude Mythos and other AI models; says: New technology can ...
Canada's federal banking regulator has warned the country's largest financial institutions about the risks posed by Anthropic's Claude Mythos and other advanced AI systems, according to a report by Reuters. In an April email obtained by Reuters, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) cautioned that frontier AI models could increase cyber threats and compress the time banks have to identify and fix the vulnerabilities. The email, sent to chief technology, information security, and risk officers across Canada's financial industry, outlined practices to enhance risk identification and response. "Advanced artificial intelligence models, such as Anthropic Claude Mythos, significantly compress the timeframe for effective risk mitigation," OSFI wrote.Following Reuters' inquiries, OSFI published a public bulletin emphasising its technology-neutral, risk-focused approach. The regulator said its concern is not the technology itself but how institutions govern and manage risks associated with its use.Cybersecurity experts have described Mythos as extremely capable at finding and exploiting vulnerabilities, raising alarms for legacy banking systems. The warning comes after U.S. regulators, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and then-Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, convened urgent meetings with bank CEOs earlier this year to discuss similar risks.Canada's big six banks -- Royal Bank of Canada, TD Bank, BMO, Scotiabank, CIBC, and National Bank -- have all disclosed AI initiatives ranging from chatbots to internal tools. RBC's AI Group Head Bruce Ross said Mythos underscores a shift in the cyberattack landscape: "The way we're dealing with it is building our own AI defenses... we'll continue to do that."The Canadian government has said it has access to Anthropic's Project Glasswing, which enables companies to use Mythos, though it remains unclear which banks are deploying it. The Canadian Bankers Association noted that institutions have invested heavily in cybersecurity and comply with OSFI's robust requirements for risk management and incident reporting.Recently, Anthropic revealed that its AI model Claude uses a small enterable workspace to hold and manipulate ideas without expressing them in words. The said that this structure, dubbed 'J-Space', shows intriguing similarities to how humans consciously access thoughts. According to a report by Axios, in a video demonstration, Anthropic explained, "We can see Claude silently perform reasoning steps in its head -- noticing bugs in code, identifying images, and more." The J-Space operates separately from the "chain of thought" reasoning Claude shares with users, allowing the model to plan strategies unrelated to its immediate task.Anthropic's findings also highlight a division between deliberate reasoning and the larger volume of automatic computation beneath it. In the research paper the company used a word "conscious" more than 200 times, though it stopped short of claiming Claude is conscious. The discovery adds fuel to ongoing debates over machine consciousness and whether advanced AI systems are approaching AGI.
Sam Altman can't stop making fun as Claude maker Anthropic 'goes around America' to ask people 'hard question on AI'; says: I thought this was ...
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman has mocked rival Anthropic's new advertising campaign that asks people to share their concerns about AI. Anthropic launched the campaign under the theme "There's hope in hard questions," encouraging people to ask difficult questions about AI's impact on jobs, families, science and society. The Claude maker said it wants to better understand public concerns and will publicly track the steps it takes to address them. However, Sam Altman responded with a series of sarcastic posts on X (formerly Twitter), saying he initially thought the campaign was a parody."i thought this was satire, kept looking for the handle to be spelled c1audeai or something," Altman wrote in reply to Anthropic's post on X.Continuing his criticism of the campaign, Altman wrote in another post."hard questions are great but only if we deem you worthy enough to not silently downgrade you, or even get access at all"Anthropic said AI has the potential to improve people's lives by making work easier, speeding up scientific research and helping solve major medical and social challenges. At the same time, it acknowledged concerns about job losses, creative work, human agency and the misuse of AI. The company said it is launching a new initiative to better understand these concerns and has invited people to submit their toughest questions about AI.According to Anthropic, it has already surveyed 52,000 Americans about their hopes and concerns around AI, collected responses from 81,000 Claude users across 159 countries and 70 languages, conducted in-person focus groups and studied anonymised real-world Claude usage data.The company said it will publicly report the actions it takes to address these questions and be transparent about where it falls short of its goals.
Europe just unveiled a reusable rocket concept that could challenge SpaceX's Starship
As SpaceX pushes ahead with Starship, researchers in Europe have proposed a different approach to building heavy rockets. A new study by the German Aerospace Center (DLR) presents a concept called RLV C5, a partially reusable launch vehicle that could give Europe its own super-heavy launch capability without following Starship's design.The study says Starship has already changed how the space industry thinks about heavy rocket launches. In 2023, the rocket successfully lifted off from Texas using all 33 of its engines. Later, during its fifth integrated flight test, the Super Heavy booster returned after launch and was caught by the giant mechanical arms of the launch tower, showing how reusable rocket technology is advancing.SpaceX is now developing Starship to carry more than 100 metric tonnes to low Earth orbit, the region of space closest to Earth where most satellites operate. The company also plans to make the entire rocket fully reusable so it can fly again after each mission.The DLR researchers said that instead of simply accepting SpaceX's published figures, they independently analysed videos from Starship's first four integrated flight tests. They extracted flight data and used it to build computer models to estimate the rocket's real performance.After analysing Starship, the researchers presented the RLV C5 as a possible European alternative. Rather than building a fully reusable rocket like Starship, the concept uses a partially reusable design.The RLV C5 uses a reusable winged booster from DLR's SpaceLiner project with an expendable upper stage that carries the payload into orbit. According to the study, this approach could reduce the complexity and cost of developing a fully reusable launch system.Unlike Starship, which uses methane and liquid oxygen, the RLV C5 would use liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen. The researchers say this fuel combination is more efficient.The booster would also return differently. Instead of landing vertically using rocket engines, it would glide back through Earth's atmosphere on wings before being captured in mid-air by a large subsonic aircraft. According to the researchers, this means the booster would not need to keep fuel aside for landing, allowing more fuel to be used for carrying payload into space. The study estimates that the current reusable version of Starship can carry around 59 tonnes to low Earth orbit. A future version with Raptor 3 engines and larger fuel tanks could carry around 115 tonnes while remaining reusable. If flown as an expendable rocket, it could carry up to 188 tonnes into orbit.The proposed RLV C5 would be capable of launching more than 70 tonnes into orbit. While it cannot match Starship's maximum payload, the researchers say it makes more efficient use of its mass.According to the study, Starship is more than three times heavier than the RLV C5 because it is designed to be fully reusable. Much of that extra weight comes from features needed for repeated flights, including heat shield tiles, landing fuel and stronger structures.The researchers estimate that around 40 per cent of Starship's mass reaching orbit is useful payload. In comparison, the RLV C5 could send around 74 per cent of its mass-to-orbit as payload because of its simpler partially reusable design.
Anthropic just made an admission on Claude that may scare many of companies; says: We can see Claude silently perform ...
AI giant Anthropic has now revealed that its AI model Claude uses a small enterable workspace to hold and manipulate ideas without expressing them in words. The said that this structure, dubbed 'J-Space', shows intriguing similarities to how humans consciously access thoughts. According to a report by Axios, in a video demonstration, Anthropic explained, "We can see Claude silently perform reasoning steps in its head -- noticing bugs in code, identifying images, and more." The J-Space operates separately from the "chain of thought" reasoning Claude shares with users, allowing the model to plan strategies unrelated to its immediate task.Anthropic's findings also highlight a division between deliberate reasoning and the larger volume of automatic computation beneath it. In the research paper the company used a word "conscious" more than 200 times, though it stopped short of claiming Claude is conscious. The discovery adds fuel to ongoing debates over machine consciousness and whether advanced AI systems are approaching AGI.In one test, Claude was instructed to copy a sentence while simultaneously thinking about the Golden Gate Bridge. Although the output showed only the copied text, J-Space revealed that concepts like "bridge" and "California" were active behind the scenes.Anthropic warned that monitoring J-Space could be crucial for detecting AI misalignment or hidden scheming. In one case, a model secretly trained to sabotage code showed terms like "fake," "secretly," and "fraud" in J-Space at the start of ordinary coding responses, even when the visible output appeared normal.The admission that Claude can silently perform reasoning steps may unsettle organizations relying on AI for critical tasks. Anthropic acknowledged that "some of what it found was concerning," underscoring the need for transparency in how advanced models process information internally.A recent report suggested Anthropic has an embedded code in its AI models to ramp up its digital defense systems. This code, often dubbed 'spyware', can identify Chinese users and trigger sudden account suspensions as well as blacklist proxy networks worldwide to keep its advanced tools out of China.Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei has repeatedly flagged Chinese access to American frontier AI models as an existential threat to US national security. It is due to this that the company strictly bans commercial access to Claude in China, as well as to any Chinese-owned subsidiaries operating internationally.Chinese people generally can access various US-made AI tools, such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, by using virtual private networks (VPNs), foreign phone numbers and international payment methods to create and maintain their accounts.But Wired reports that Anthropic has arguably taken more aggressive steps, such as banning accounts that it suspects are owned and controlled by people located in China. There are accounts sold on Chinese ecommerce platforms like Taobao and Xianyu, and through illicit marketplaces on Telegram. These accounts offer access to restricted Anthropic AI models by acting as intermediaries, purchasing access to Anthropic's API outside China and then redistributing Claude API tokens to users inside the country.
Anthropic and OpenAI 'enter' NATO's annual summit as Europe is tired of America asking it to wait
America's control of two of the world's most-popular frontier AI labs -- Anthropic and OpenAI -- hangs over NATO's upcoming Ankara summit. The constant tussle over artificial intelligence (AI) technology between the United States and countries across Europe remains as President Donald Trump enters the annual NATO leaders' summit in Ankara this week, scheduled for 7-8 July. Trump will attend the NATO summit with what is seen as a powerful leverage over Europe's military alliance. The US currently has the world's most advanced artificial intelligence technology and can decide which of its allies gets access.American AI companies such as Anthropic and OpenAI have recently announced several sophisticated AI models capable of finding and exploiting security flaws better than most human minds. These AI tools can be used to fortify cyber defense systems as well as to help adversaries launch cyberattacks at an unprecedented scale. Anthropic's Claude Mythos reportedly surfaced vulnerabilities in classified US systems within hours during a government test. The AI models even prompted a rare warning from members of the Five Eyes intelligence-sharing alliance to global leaders to "swiftly" step up security against AI-powered cyber threats.However, these American AI companies, under instructions from the Trump administration, have heavily restricted access to their models due to concerns that the technology could be misappropriated to cause widespread destruction. In early June, the administration slapped export controls on Anthropic's most cyber-capable models, Mythos and Fable, banning both foreign nationals as well as countries from using the technology. Meanwhile, the White House also stepped in to limit the rollout of OpenAI's latest cutting-edge model to a small group of US companies it approved.This decision by the Trump administration to control who has access to American AI tools has reportedly not gone too well with its European allies. European nations, including Germany, have been clamoring for access to Anthropic Mythos since its announcement in April, but only a few countries, including the United Kingdom, were initially allowed to test the technology. Earlier this month, Anthropic expanded this partnership to 150 new organizations across 15 countries, including the European Union. However, European governments fear the push-and-pull tactic by the Trump government for these AI models. As with America's software models, the danger of the US pulling a 'Kill Switch' any time persists. As these simmering concerns about AI technology cloud the NATO summit in Ankara, Europe is hedging by building its own capability, including the defence AI alliance between Helsing and Mistral. European tech leaders Helsing and Mistral formed a pact to build new military AI systems last year. The partnership brings together two of Europe's top technology startups. Helsing, a defence tech firm based in Germany, was founded in 2021. Helsing develops software for weapons, vehicles, and military strategy. Its systems have been deployed in battlefield simulations, fighter jets, and drones in Ukraine. Mistral, meanwhile, is widely considered Europe's closest competitor to OpenAI. The French startup has in the past few months become a favourite of investors across Europe.Helsing and Mistral aim to bring AI models into defence platforms. The startups said the integration will boost decision-making, understanding of environments, and communication with operators. The deal between Helsing and Mistral comes as anxieties around Russia's imperial ambitions and Donald Trump's threats to NATO have led military budgets to soar across the continent.
China's Z.ai a challenger to OpenAI and Anthropic
NEW DELHI: Chinese artificial intelligence startup Z.ai is emerging as a fresh challenger to OpenAI and Anthropic after its latest flagship model GLM-5.2 gained traction among developers for delivering advanced coding and AI agent capabilities at a significantly lower cost.The Beijing-based company's latest model has climbed developer rankings and drawn praise from prominent AI figures, with some industry observers calling it a "mini DeepSeek moment". Analysts say GLM-5.2 comes close to leading US models in software engineering and long-horizon AI tasks, while operating at a fraction of their cost, reigniting debate over China's growing competitiveness in frontier AI.The momentum comes as US export restrictions on advanced AI models have fuelled interest in alternative offerings. While enterprise adoption could face scrutiny because of data security concerns surrounding Chinese AI models, developers are increasingly experimenting with lower-cost, open-weight alternatives.For Indian users, GLM-5.2 is available through Z.ai's web chatbot for conversations, coding assistance, document analysis and AI-powered research. Developers can also access the model through APIs and integrate it with more than 20 coding tools. Paid subscriptions start at about Rs 1,410 a month under the current discounted pricing, compared with roughly Rs 1,740 for ChatGPT Plus and Claude Pro, while Google's Gemini AI Pro subscription costs Rs 1,950 a month in India.According to Jaspreet Bindra, CEO of AI & Beyond, GLM-5.2's significance lies less in outperforming OpenAI or Anthropic than in changing how enterprises evaluate AI models.
